<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Likelihood of Success</title>
	<atom:link href="http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com</link>
	<description>Ron Coleman, and friends</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 16:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Why hasn&#8217;t Keith Olbermann been fired? by Cary</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16981</link>
		<dc:creator>Cary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16981</guid>
		<description>Remember when reporters use to be objective and take their jobs seriously?  Not with Keith Olbermann and his buddy Chris Matthews on MSNBC/NBC.  A hideous network.

Olbermann has serious problems and ESPN was glad to be rid of him.  A real nutcase and for him I really do feel sorry.  But, some people in this nation actually buy what this guy is selling.  Why can't Olbermann, Matthews and the rest of the gang at MSNBC and NBC just report facts?  Are they in the tank for Obama or just being in-your-face so they hope to get out of the viewing celler?  A little of both now...started out selling advertisement but I'm here to tell advertisers.  The characters and their advertising doesn't come into my house any longer.

We can only hope that somebody at GE gets rid of the whole bunch at MSNBC and NBC...the girls that read what they are given too just like the boys...and start fresh.  Maybe my wife's GE stock will start to perform better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Remember when reporters use to be objective and take their jobs seriously?  Not with Keith Olbermann and his buddy Chris Matthews on MSNBC/NBC.  A hideous network.</p>
<p>Olbermann has serious problems and ESPN was glad to be rid of him.  A real nutcase and for him I really do feel sorry.  But, some people in this nation actually buy what this guy is selling.  Why can&#8217;t Olbermann, Matthews and the rest of the gang at MSNBC and NBC just report facts?  Are they in the tank for Obama or just being in-your-face so they hope to get out of the viewing celler?  A little of both now&#8230;started out selling advertisement but I&#8217;m here to tell advertisers.  The characters and their advertising doesn&#8217;t come into my house any longer.</p>
<p>We can only hope that somebody at GE gets rid of the whole bunch at MSNBC and NBC&#8230;the girls that read what they are given too just like the boys&#8230;and start fresh.  Maybe my wife&#8217;s GE stock will start to perform better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy marriage in sunny California by hydralisk</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/15/happy-marriage-in-sunny-california/#comment-16980</link>
		<dc:creator>hydralisk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 02:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1123#comment-16980</guid>
		<description>The effect seems to be a decoupling of marriage from procreation as a legitimate state interest. If sexual orientation is irrelevant, then creation of children must also be (as well as, one would hope, sex itself). And if that's the case, then is there anything now stopping me from applying for a marriage license with a friend or a neighbor or a sister or a cousin or a daughter? I could use some benef--er, I mean rights. 

Damn it, give me my rights!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The effect seems to be a decoupling of marriage from procreation as a legitimate state interest. If sexual orientation is irrelevant, then creation of children must also be (as well as, one would hope, sex itself). And if that&#8217;s the case, then is there anything now stopping me from applying for a marriage license with a friend or a neighbor or a sister or a cousin or a daughter? I could use some benef&#8211;er, I mean rights. </p>
<p>Damn it, give me my rights!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy marriage in sunny California by Jack</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/15/happy-marriage-in-sunny-california/#comment-16979</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 22:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1123#comment-16979</guid>
		<description>Two poles and both are positive make charge at either one
So that canceled out are not at ends they've just begun,
By court of law the natural is questioned and addressed
And finding better substitute all precedent redressed,
The people finding in their stance the public misaligned
Supremely are they chastened and by judgment reassigned,
The moral of this story is that judges judge the law
You cannot remake culture til you've adjudged all the flaws
And who could condemn better than a lawyer's best defense
That what is best the common good is really just expense?
If everyone's conformance is that everyone is free
Then liberty's more geared to whim than cut to be a key,
When positive to positive are said to both attract 
Then why do people argue, just let arbiters enact,
If citizens were wiser then as judges they would be
Better to be subjects who are ruled in absentee,
For the wisest who among us understand our true intent
Are noble in their private parts, they do not need assent,
So public do not worry long or fret if all is well
And if this seems quite queer to you then you can go to hell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two poles and both are positive make charge at either one<br />
So that canceled out are not at ends they&#8217;ve just begun,<br />
By court of law the natural is questioned and addressed<br />
And finding better substitute all precedent redressed,<br />
The people finding in their stance the public misaligned<br />
Supremely are they chastened and by judgment reassigned,<br />
The moral of this story is that judges judge the law<br />
You cannot remake culture til you&#8217;ve adjudged all the flaws<br />
And who could condemn better than a lawyer&#8217;s best defense<br />
That what is best the common good is really just expense?<br />
If everyone&#8217;s conformance is that everyone is free<br />
Then liberty&#8217;s more geared to whim than cut to be a key,<br />
When positive to positive are said to both attract<br />
Then why do people argue, just let arbiters enact,<br />
If citizens were wiser then as judges they would be<br />
Better to be subjects who are ruled in absentee,<br />
For the wisest who among us understand our true intent<br />
Are noble in their private parts, they do not need assent,<br />
So public do not worry long or fret if all is well<br />
And if this seems quite queer to you then you can go to hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Happy marriage in sunny California by Avigdor MBawlmawr</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/15/happy-marriage-in-sunny-california/#comment-16978</link>
		<dc:creator>Avigdor MBawlmawr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1123#comment-16978</guid>
		<description>I've been in the shadows for too long! Now, I can go to California where Fido and I can live without shame!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in the shadows for too long! Now, I can go to California where Fido and I can live without shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why hasn&#8217;t Keith Olbermann been fired? by Jack</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16977</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 20:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16977</guid>
		<description>I think it has something to do with the guy the post is about Ron. Small arsonists can still start large fires.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it has something to do with the guy the post is about Ron. Small arsonists can still start large fires.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why hasn&#8217;t Keith Olbermann been fired? by Ron Coleman</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16976</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16976</guid>
		<description>Can any of you explain to me why this post from April 2007 has become so popular?

And it's not even a post. It's a link to Bob Cox's post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can any of you explain to me why this post from April 2007 has become so popular?</p>
<p>And it&#8217;s not even a post. It&#8217;s a link to Bob Cox&#8217;s post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why hasn&#8217;t Keith Olbermann been fired? by David</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16974</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16974</guid>
		<description>I used to love Olbermann on Sports Center with Dan Patrick in the 1990's. If you loved sports, they were an entertaining escape for an hour while finding out if your teams won or not. That was then and now, I cannot stand to even look at him and he is one of a few people that we simply do not allow to come into our home. He is bitter, arrogant, pompous, superfluous and so damned biased without having the guts to admit it. I don't mind any  commentator who is biased and opinionated on either side and puts his or her cards on the table. The fact that they have this hack on real "news" shows is a joke that NBC/MSNBC is going to fail with. Olbermann's well documented personality problems, deep-seated emotional problems (of which he has needed mental health counseling) over the years has done nothing but create problems where ever he works. I choose not to allow this idiot into my home, but what really bothers me is that liberal NBC put him on the Sunday night NFL football pregame and half time! Now, I must turn the game on only when I know it is about to start, change the channel at halftime and back again for the start of the second half. I hate mixing politics and sports/entertainment. These idiots need to understand that the average American uses sports/entertainment to escape things like politics!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to love Olbermann on Sports Center with Dan Patrick in the 1990&#8217;s. If you loved sports, they were an entertaining escape for an hour while finding out if your teams won or not. That was then and now, I cannot stand to even look at him and he is one of a few people that we simply do not allow to come into our home. He is bitter, arrogant, pompous, superfluous and so damned biased without having the guts to admit it. I don&#8217;t mind any  commentator who is biased and opinionated on either side and puts his or her cards on the table. The fact that they have this hack on real &#8220;news&#8221; shows is a joke that NBC/MSNBC is going to fail with. Olbermann&#8217;s well documented personality problems, deep-seated emotional problems (of which he has needed mental health counseling) over the years has done nothing but create problems where ever he works. I choose not to allow this idiot into my home, but what really bothers me is that liberal NBC put him on the Sunday night NFL football pregame and half time! Now, I must turn the game on only when I know it is about to start, change the channel at halftime and back again for the start of the second half. I hate mixing politics and sports/entertainment. These idiots need to understand that the average American uses sports/entertainment to escape things like politics!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why hasn&#8217;t Keith Olbermann been fired? by Seth</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16973</link>
		<dc:creator>Seth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 07:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2007/04/15/why-hasnt-keith-olbermann-been-fired/#comment-16973</guid>
		<description>I can't believe this is the same guy that did sports. Just heard a diatribe by him about Bush giving up golf. It was somewhat entertaining until he said that 4000 died for nothing. That is a brutal thing to say. Our military guys are just doing their jobs and whether he wants to admit it or not, the vote to go was almost unanimous with Democrats too. I don't hear him yelling at all the Dems who voted to go. The ironic thing is that if they would have done there job and voted no WE WOULD NOT BE THERE!!

He lost me as a viewer forever tonight. I look at him now and just think he is pathetic and tries way too hard. I watch Oreilly and at least he asks questions and has people on from all sides.

And as bad as that show can be, O'Reilly IS on a much higher level. Too bad because I wish I could watch both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe this is the same guy that did sports. Just heard a diatribe by him about Bush giving up golf. It was somewhat entertaining until he said that 4000 died for nothing. That is a brutal thing to say. Our military guys are just doing their jobs and whether he wants to admit it or not, the vote to go was almost unanimous with Democrats too. I don&#8217;t hear him yelling at all the Dems who voted to go. The ironic thing is that if they would have done there job and voted no WE WOULD NOT BE THERE!!</p>
<p>He lost me as a viewer forever tonight. I look at him now and just think he is pathetic and tries way too hard. I watch Oreilly and at least he asks questions and has people on from all sides.</p>
<p>And as bad as that show can be, O&#8217;Reilly IS on a much higher level. Too bad because I wish I could watch both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Football? by Jack</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/15/football/#comment-16968</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 14:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1122#comment-16968</guid>
		<description>" Surely Specter has something better to do with his time."


Knowing him, I doubt it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Surely Specter has something better to do with his time.&#8221;</p>
<p>Knowing him, I doubt it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Football? by David Linn</title>
		<link>http://likelihoodofsuccess.com/2008/05/15/football/#comment-16967</link>
		<dc:creator>David Linn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jerseylaw.wordpress.com/?p=1122#comment-16967</guid>
		<description>This congressional interest has me baffled as well. Is this the long and winding arm of the commerce clause?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This congressional interest has me baffled as well. Is this the long and winding arm of the commerce clause?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
