Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Faith and Works’ Category

The color chain

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 30, 2007

img00025.jpg

Rabbi Meir used to say: How is Techeles [blue color used in Tzitzis] different from all other colors? The Techeles looks like the sea, and the sea looks like the sky and the sky looks like a sapphire stone and the sapphire stone looks like the Throne of Honor (of the Almighty).

Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Chullin 89a. One of the leading orthodox lecturers on Jewish thought, Rabbi Yissocher Frand, explains why we are given this relatively long chain of association: Because we all must take one step at a time. Brilliant color and light can stimulate us, inspire us, and like all things that compel the soul make us want to absorb them and transcend. We are swept up by beauty and want to meld with it. This after all is a kind of love. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit | 4 Comments »

My best post of the year

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 20, 2007

It was in June, and it was not written on this blog, or on Dean’s World. Tonight I was browsing friends’ blogs and came across this article, and it reminded me of what I’d written on a related topic last June. It was originally published on Beyond BT, a blog for “BT’s,” i.e., baalei teshuva — Jews who have adopted Jewish practice late in life. I have reprinted it here, changing some of the lingo and adding some explanatory links, but changing none of the self-obsession. If you don’t go in for that you can browse away now!

You can find the original post, and the extensive commentary that followed (some of it also laden with Yiddish-Hebrew terminology, however), here.

Everyone gives up something when he becomes a religious Jew, or frum. Some more than others, of course. Sometimes precious relationships are breached and, unfortunately, can never be repaired. Other times, people give up lucrative career opportunities or fame or one or another kind of social standing. These are the sacrifices that even the least learned baalei teshuva place on the altar in their service to God.

Now I, for instance, did not give up a particularly notable “party” lifestyle, including any of the elements you might associate with that; I was always on the square side. Is giving up three hours a day of TV considering giving up “something”? Hardly. As to food, I never liked shellfish. Okay, cheeseburgers, chicken parmigiana — but what serious person can reckon the loss of a particular kind of food, or even the convenience of being able to eat anywhere, serious sacrifices when offered the opportunity of personal and spiritual fulfillment in exchange?

Yes, more subtle sacrifices are the social things attendant to these physical pleasures — the inability to “go out” with friends and colleagues to restaurants, say on Friday nights. These return as momentary blips of the heart, but if a person merits the development of a decently normal frum life in a frum community and is blessed with a frum family, these are easily recognized as pleasures of dubious worth. You simply do not share the values of the people you are not going out with and as nice as all the restaurants and bars in the world look from the outside, they are — aside from the value of fellowship with any decent person, which I refuse to assign a zero value, as transient as it may be — easily recognized, also, as basically empty inside. (I do not even understand what married people are doing in restaurants at 9 PM — don’t they have families? My father was never in a restaurant on a weeknight, or in a bar, ever. Maybe that’s why I’m here with you today.) At least, I, for my part, have gotten past these, and do not struggle, even though there are pangs.

Now, I will tell you, if you agree not to tease me or make a big deal about it, that I used to be a very successful collegiate actor. You will, I hope, entertain me when I say that, back in the day, I could entertain you; that I reached a point in my college stage career that I could, and did, cause a thousand people to erupt in laughter by raising an eyebrow; that I shared the stage with a famous Hollywood star in those days and held my own, and then some. I held audiences in the palm of my hand. But do you think that is what I miss by virtue of becoming an observant Jew? It is not. In fact, even in my callow and “secular” state, I knew how preposterously unhealthy it would be to seek this dopamine rush regularly. This was so not only because the big bad world was not college, but also because I knew that almost no one makes it, or stays made, and that even those who come close get addicted to this sort of ego gratification. Most become — as we see on the gossip pages — horrid shells of people, attention and adulation junkies for whom happiness is always transient and who end up relying not just on greasepaint and hair dye but on the liquid, pill and powdered chemical substitutes for that rush. There’s no business like show business for a reason.

No, I do not miss the stage.

I miss the music. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Ars Longa, Faith and Works | 11 Comments »

Cultural exchange is not a one way street

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 18, 2007

We always assume, in our culture, that more information, more transparency, more exchange is better.

But as Avakesh says, “on this day [tomorrow], a fast was proclaimed because the Torah was translated into Greek. This is why.”

(The term ruach hakodesh in the post literally means “Holy Spirit” — that is, Divine inspiration.)

Posted in Faith and Works, Oppression, Past is prologue | 6 Comments »

The captive word

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 18, 2007

Not everything that is thought should be said, not everything that is said should be written, and not everything that is written should be published.

This is credited to Rabbi Israel Salanter.

The blog, the BlackBerry, the email are all vacuums, begging for content. Yet so often there is far more utility in shutting up; perhaps this is why Rabbi Shimon Ben Gamliel says in the Mishna, “All my days I grew up among sages, and I have found nothing greater for a person than silence” (Ethics of the Fathers, 1:17).

Is there a greater test, especially in our time, for the verbally facile, the spiritually agitated, the spirit seeking connection?

UPDATE:  Turns out I used a version of that quote before.

Posted in Faith and Works, Homo sapiens, O Mores! | 7 Comments »

Not your liberal Chanuka

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 9, 2007

This post is a couple of years old, but it is timeless, and very good seasonal food for thought. Toby Katz explains some harsh truths about the “Jewish Christmas”:
Chanuka in Clifton

With Chanuka coming in a few days we can be sure that along with the Chanuka tree and the Chanuka wreath, we will have the annual round of phony newspaper stories about Chanuka being the holiday of religious freedom.

The usual story (American version) goes something like this: There were these bad guys, the Greeks/Republicans/Christian Right who persecuted the good guys, the Jews/Democrats/pluralists. The bad guys tried to impose a theocracy and do away with the Bill of Rights. Then there was like a total unbelievable miracle and these Jews who are normally peace-loving pacifists got up the gumption to stand up for the principle of Separation of Church and State and multiculturalism. And the good guys won! The theocracy of the Greeks was overthrown, and the Jews established instead a liberal democracy with religious freedom for all.

Of course this story is total nonsense.

It is. Surprise your friends with your legitimate understanding of Chanuka at the office “holiday party” and “read the whole thing.”

Cross-posted on Right Wing News.

UPDATE:  See, I’m onto something here.

Posted in Americana, Faith and Works | 2 Comments »

The miracle of impotent symbolism

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 4, 2007

The Jerusalem Post reports on a story that proves that environmentalists’ tunnel vision and tin ear to public sympathy is more or less universal:

In a campaign that has spread like wildfire across the Internet, a group of Israeli environmentalists is encouraging Jews around the world to light at least one less candle this Hanukka to help the environment.

The founders of the Green Hanukkia campaign found that every candle that burns completely produces 15 grams of carbon dioxide. If an estimated one million Israeli households light for eight days, they said, it would do significant damage to the atmosphere.

“The campaign calls for Jews around the world to save the last candle and save the planet, so we won’t need another miracle,” said Liad Ortar, the campaign’s cofounder, who runs the Arkada environmental consulting firm and the Ynet Web site’s environmental forum.

Well, this campaign is sure to get support from England, France and of course the Muslim world — see, everything really is the Jews’ fault! Fifteen grams of CO2 per Jew!

What dim bulbs.

Posted in Faith and Works, Sisyphus | 5 Comments »

Solving Islamophobia

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 4, 2007

Robert Spencer has a … “road map,” let’s call it:

At the [Islamaphobia] Conference these wise souls will spend two days bemoaning hostility directed at Muslims and scratching their heads over why anyone might be upset with them. And although the participants will no doubt enjoy the two days in Constantinople, I could save them the trip. In the next two minutes, I will solve the problem of “Islamophobia,” right here, right now. That’s right! And there is nothing up my sleeve, ladies and gentlemen!In the first place, attacks on innocent civilians are never justified. Louts, thugs and vigilantes have no excuse, and anyone who targets random Muslims and commits violence against them deserves to be punished to the full extent of the law.

But if one wants to understand why it is happening, and what can be done to end it, no two-day star-studded conference is needed — unless, of course, that conference is meant to highlight the victim status of Muslims and divert attention from jihad terror activity. if Muslims want to end “Islamophobia” instantaneously, here’s how they can do it:

Go there and read it.

Posted in Faith and Works, Oppression, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

Faith or … poof!

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 29, 2007

They’re having a freewheeling “God, Truth and Eternity” series of posts and related threads on Dean’s World.  That’s one of that blog’s enduring merits — it doesn’t consider itself too fancy to have Square One debates early, often and wide open.

I wrote the following in response to a comment there, which is quoted in the indented passages here:

[T]he concept of a “God” who demands that I believe things that are logically indistinguishable from fairy tales or else he will punish me eternally… that is a God I find abhorrent, immoral and if not pure evil, then it’s hard to find something more evil than that.

Your logic is inconsistent. If there were such a God he would by your own definition transcend your definition, or ability to define, good and evil. And old argument, of course.

But I think more significant is that it really is a very egotistical formulation. Listen:

the concept of a “God” who demands that I believe things that are logically indistinguishable from fairy tales or else he will punish me eternally…

You are judging good and evil, and indeed divinity, based on your personal analysis of what is “logically indistinguishable from fairy tales”? Do you realize how many people, as smart as you, have so characterized assertions that have turned out to actually be true, in the worlds of science and history?

This is what people mean when they say that a certain kind of purported non-believer worships only himself. That’s what this formulation amounts to: If I — the height of cognitive evolution, and utterly devoid of bias — can’t figure it out, it’s not only impossible. It’s — what was the formulation again?

abhorrent, immoral and if not pure evil, then it’s hard to find something more evil than that

Du-hude!

weekday-morning.jpg

Posted in Faith and Works, O Mores! | 4 Comments »

Thankful to ….

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 21, 2007

Originally published at Dean’s World, Thanksgiving 2006:

A million essays and blog posts will explore the topic of “being thankful” in the next 24 hours.

I’d say, based on a perusal of a Google search I just ran seeking a link to add to this post on my blog, that at least 80% of them talk about “being thankful” with no reference whatsoever to Whom (or even whom) one should be thankful.

It is an utter logical dead end. You cannot, by definition, have “thanks” without an object of thanks. It is meaningless.

thank

TRANSITIVE VERB:
thanked , thank·ing , thanks

1. To express gratitude to; give thanks to: He thanked her for the gift.
2. To hold responsible; credit: We can thank the parade for this traffic jam.

You can’t have free-floating thanks. You can thank her for the gift, you can thank the parade for the traffic. You can’t just thank, however.

You can eat turkey. You can watch football. You get together with family and you can call it Thanksgiving. But not thanksgiving.

Whom are you thanking this Thanksgiving?

Posted in Americana, Faith and Works | 5 Comments »

Ben Stein still all about Intelligence

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 12, 2007

I’ve been back and forth on the topic of Ben Stein for well over 20 years. I loved his writing from the time I was first exposed to it, and he used to be human-sized enough to correspond with me by email when he just wrote for the old American Spectator, but oddly enough when I would challenge him — gingerly — on religious issues (he is Jewish, as I am), he would stop (and eventually did) stop writing back. Okay, I get it. Celebrity, kind of.

His writing is certainly idiosyncratic, and I don’t agree with everything he says. But he says it very well, very sincerely and he’s mostly right, and very original.

But he just may win me back over with this — his crusade against the crusade against Intelligent Design. He even has a blog about it. I need to do some homework to figure out the relationship between Ben Stein and God, but evidently he’s, not surprisingly, kept an open mind about it… unlike some people. Stein told the New York Times:

Mr. Stein, a prolific author who has acted in movies like “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” and appeared on television programs including “Win Ben Stein’s Money” on Comedy Central, said in a telephone interview that he accepted the producers’ invitation to participate in the film not because he disavows the theory of evolution — he said there was a “very high likelihood” that Darwin was on to something — but because he does not accept that evolution alone can explain life on earth.

He said he also believed the theory of evolution leads to racism and ultimately genocide, an idea common among creationist thinkers. If it were up to him, he said, the film would be called “From Darwin to Hitler.”

Well, of course, just as we can’t say that the theory of evolution is not valid because it leads to atheism, we can’t say that if it leads to racism and genocide, it also must be empirically incorrect. As he says, surely Darwin is onto something, and, short of unethical experimentation, we should probably always let science take us where it goes. But he and the filmmakers are challenging a cultural moment here, not arguing the merits of the debate, from what I can tell (I can also tell where the comments section is going to go notwithstanding that caveat), and I can’t wait for the picture to come out.

Posted in Faith and Works, Medialites | 45 Comments »