Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Past is prologue’ Category

Britain’s new Jew hatred

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 5, 2007

Melanie Phillips, via Instapundit:

One of the most conspicuous features of British anti-Semitism is that the British deny its existence. The Parliamentary inquiry received only a muted response. Both Mann and Richard Littlejohn, a journalist whose TV program on the subject aired in July 2007, encountered people who, when discovering their concern about anti-Semitism, said: “Oh, I didn’t know you were Jewish.” But Mann and Littlejohn aren’t Jewish. As Littlejohn noted, the implication was that no non-Jew would ever identify anti-Semitism, and therefore that anti-Semitism was generally a figment of the Jewish imagination. When I proposed to write a book about it, I was turned down by every mainstream publishing house. “No British publisher will touch this,” one editorial director told me. “Claiming there is anti-Semitism in Britain is simply unsayable.” . . .

Britons also tend to suspect that Jews use the charge of anti-Semitism to divert attention from Israel’s crimes. This is why, for so many in Britain, the suggestion that anti-Semitism is enjoying a renaissance seems not only false but sinister. Outraged to be accused of peddling bigotry, they begin to hate those who level that charge—who, they conclude, are part of a conspiracy against truth.

This is a long-time beat for Melanie Phillips, but in fact there is nothing at all controversial in what she is saying (i.e., the facts she cites) except as to her conclusion. Anyone observing what has happened in Western Europe for the last five to ten years knows it, and in the Jewish community it is well known that England and France are simply not hospitable to Jews, at least not conspicuous Jews, any more.

Phillips also notes the coded use of the term “neoconservatives” to refer to the “Jewish conspiracy,” a transparent phenomenon that nonetheless is consistently ignored even by Jews who, like the self-satisfied Britons and Frenchmen who are above bigotry, would rather not admit what is happening.  (UPDATE:  Maybe ignored a little less.)

It’s somewhat scary. Vigilance helps; but only God controls the world, and there are no obvious answers on the natural axis, anyway. It is not an extermination scenario, à la Nazi Germany; that comparison is facile, too. Anyway, it is facile to tell people living in England or France to pick up and move, despite having families, homes, communities and businesses there. And where to? Immigrating to the US is very difficult these days, unless you do it illegally — not an option for intact families with jobs, credentials and bona fides. Israel is not an option for most people; it is very difficult for people from Western civilization to adapt to, and is itself a highly polarized and stressed-out society.

The good news is that Britain and France are democracies with imperfect, but still well established, constitutional traditions. There is no telling what sort of impact a national leader willing to admit to the existence of this phenomenon in these countries, and to face it head on, could accomplish. No such leadership has been forthcoming, despite what one can only posit are the Jewish puppet-masters’ best efforts. But what other hope, in this world, is there?

Posted in Euroids, Oppression, Past is prologue | 21 Comments »

Mameh loshon

Posted by Ron Coleman on October 31, 2007

Eric Schie picks up on a John Edwards detail, but doesn’t grasp its significance:yiddish-curious-george.gif

For his part, Edwards repeatedly referred to Republicans as “NEOCONS!” When he scolded Hillary for her favorable vote on the Iran resolution, he said it was “drafted in the language of the NEOCONS!” (As to what language that would be, I don’t know.)

Oh, I do, bubbele.

Posted in Past is prologue, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

Comrade Shock Treatment

Posted by Ron Coleman on October 17, 2007

At Hamline University, they’re using psychiatry the old fashioned way: To enforce groupthink. There’s lots of that retro stuff going on, actually.

politburo.jpg

There may be more to this story.

I sure hope so. (Via IP.)

Posted in Americana, Oppression, Past is prologue | 1 Comment »

It’s the right thing to do

Posted by Ron Coleman on October 11, 2007

One reason to like George Bush more than Jerry Ford:

US President George W. Bush will risk angering China by attending a ceremony next week to award a Congress medal to the exiled Tibetan leader, the Dalai Lama, at the bastion of American democracy[, the Capitol].

What does the late, mediocre Jerry Ford have to do with this?  You mean, you don’t remember when Ford, afraid of upsetting our then-would-be-masters (also Reds, yes!, now that you mention it), refused to make a similar gesture to Nobel Prize winner Alexander Solzhenitsyn, the prophet of Communism’s tragedy.

It’s a different time; the power equations are, somewhat, different; the dissidents and their messages are, perhaps, not the same.  But the contrast between two Republican Presidents is what is most compelling.

Posted in Past is prologue | 2 Comments »

Kent State ’07

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 19, 2007

The shock of the Tasergate doesn’t wear off. Man.

Althouse‘s “Meade” brings it:

Campus police and Bushhitler coming
We’re finally on our own
This summer we felt the horrific harbinger
One tased in Florida

Gotta get down to it
Shutting our microphones down
Shoulda been done long ago

What if you knew him and
found him tased on the ground?
How can you run
when you know it’s an iconic turning point?

America’s most self-important, self-satisfied generation begets America’s most trivial.

First tragedy, then farce, right?

Posted in Americana, Oppression, Past is prologue | 1 Comment »

Ripples of the Holocaust

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 16, 2007

“A Holocaust mystery finds some answers.”

This story doesn’t require any commentary, but you may have missed it.

Posted in Oppression, Past is prologue | Leave a Comment »

The City

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 11, 2007

Manhattan has been compelled to expand skyward because of the absence of any other direction in which to grow. This, more than any other thing, is responsible for its physical majesty. It is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village–the visible symbol of aspiration and faith, the white plume saying that the way is up. The summer traveler swings in … and as [his car] glides above the pigeon lofts and back yards of Queens looks southwest to where the morning light first strikes the steel peaks of midtown, and he sees its upward thrust unmistakable: the great wall of sand towers rising, the smoke rising, the heat not yet rising, the hopes and ferments of so many awakening millions rising–this vigorous spear that presses heaven hard….

The subtlest change in New York is something people don’t speak much about but that is in everyone’s mind. The city, for the first time in its long history, is destructible. A single flight of planes no bigger that a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal chambers, cremate the millions. The intimidation of mortality is part of New York now: in the sound of jets overhead, in the black headlines of the latest edition.  All dwellers in cities must live with the stubborn fact of annihilation; in New York the fact is somewhat more concentrated because of the concentration of the city itself, and because, of all targets, New York has a certain clear priority. In the mind of whatever perverted dreamer who might loose the lightning, New York must hold a steady, irresistible charm.

It used to be that the Statue of Liberty was the signpost that proclaimed New York and translated it for all the world. Today Liberty shares the role with Death. Along the East River, from the razed laughterhouses of Turtle Bay, as though in a race with the spectral flight of planes, men are carving out the permanent headquarters of the United Nations–the greatest housing project of them all. In its stride, New York takes on one more interior city, to shelter, this time, all governments, and to clear the slum called war. New York is not a capital city–it is not a national capital or a stage capital. But it is by way of becoming the capital of the world. The buildings, as conceived by architects, will be cigar boxes set on end. Traffic will flow in a new tunnel under First Avenue. Forty-seventh Street will be widened (and if my guess is any good, trucks will appear late at night to plant tall trees surreptitiously, their roots to mingle with the intestines of the town). Once again the city will absorb, almost without showing any sign of it, a congress of visitors. . . .

The city at last perfectly illustrates both the universal dilemma and the general solution, this riddle in steel and stone is at once the perfect target and the perfect demonstration of nonviolence, of racial brotherhood, this lofty target scraping the skies and meeting the destroying planes halfway, home of all people and all nations, capital of everything, housing the deliberations by which the planes are to be stayed and their errand forestalled.

A block or two west of the new City of Man in Turtle Bay there is an old willow tree that presides over an interior garden. It is a battered tree, long-suffering and much-climbed, held together by strands of wire but beloved of those who know it. In a way it symbolizes the city: life under difficulties, growth against odds, sap-rise in the midst of concrete, and the steady reaching for the sun. Whenever I look at it nowadays, and feel the cold shadow of the planes, I thing: “This must be saved, this particular thing, this very tree.” If it were to go, all would go–the city, this mischievous and marvelous monument which not to look upon would be like death.

E. B. White, Here is New York (1949) .

My September 11th, here.

Posted in Americana, Past is prologue | 1 Comment »

What the Jewish-controlled media won’t tell you about 9/11

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 8, 2007

Instapundit points to this extraordinary article in the Weekly Standard about the Nazi roots of Al Qaeda, by a German analyst:

What ideas propelled [9/11 plotter Mohammed] Atta and the others to act? . . . . One participant in the Koran circle meetings, Shahid Nickels, said Atta’s Weltanschauung was based on a “National Socialist way of thinking.” Atta was convinced that the Jews were striving for world domination and considered New York City the center of world Jewry, which was, in his opinion, Enemy No. 1. Fellow students who lived in Motassedeq’s dormitory testified that he shared these views and waxed enthusiastic about a forthcoming “big action.” One student quoted Motassedeq as saying, “The Jews will burn and in the end we will dance on their graves.”. . .

Amazingly, neither the American media nor the international press took much notice of this testimony, largely refusing to report on Atta’s and Motassedeq’s explicit Jew-hatred. [I]n this case, involving attackers of Arab background, journalists apparently found the issue irrelevant. . . .

[Similarly,] the 9/11 Commission Report is a case in point. Instead of discussing the fact that Jew-hatred had reached epidemic proportions in the Islamic world well before September 11, the report gives the impression that Islamism originally arose in response to recent American and Western policies. . . .

A struggle against Islamism waged in ignorance of Islamist ideology weakens the West. The attribution of guilt to Israel and the United States adds fuel to the flames of Islamist propaganda and drives the wedge deeper into the Western camp rather than where it belongs–in the Muslim world.

Such blindness is especially hazardous in the case of the Iranian nuclear program, whose danger arises from the unique ideological stew surrounding it: the mish-mash of Jew-hatred, Holocaust denial, and Shiite death-cult messianism that is the context for Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons and advanced missiles.

What’s the explanation for this? I would posit a few possible ones:

  • A completely misplaced desire to avoid offending Muslims, who of course should not be offended, if they are indeed moderate, by accurate descriptions of their extremist brethren
  • A similarly misplaced, though relatively benign, desire to avoid, ironically, “blaming” the Jews for “bringing” this attack “on” America — as if to report this twisted, and objectively preposterous rationale would be to vindicate it
  • A left-wing desire to urge as “root causes” of extremist violence Western policies that are conveniently the opposite of their preferred policy prescriptions, coupled with the fact that describing deep-seated Arab antisemitism as a motivation would undermine those very preferred policies (e.g., more pressure to produce Israeli “concessions” from their friendly neighbors who supposedly desire only to live in peace with the their Jew neighbors)

Mix and match, or suggest your own. But don’t expect to read about this in the New York Times.

UPDATE:  Meanwhile, across the Pond…

Posted in Medialites, Orient, Past is prologue | 5 Comments »

“Radical Transparency”

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 3, 2007

Erik Schmidt of the Tech LawForum frets about online anonymity in a thoughtful undated article that has just come to my attention, but questions the conclusions in the piece published here where I posit the end of the world due to “assymetric personal warfare.” He writes:

Do the anonymous defamers really hold all the cards online? Sure, like guerrilla fighters, they can blend into the background at will, popping up again later to stir up trouble. But even the most cursory glance at AutoAdmit discussions reveals an abundance of name-calling, random stupidity (”LOL YALE IS TEH GAY!!!”), and insecurity. In examining online defamation, wouldn’t it be useful to inquire as to the reasonableness of giving any credibility to the statements being made?

Assuming the sixteen law firms that didn’t give the Yale grad callbacks actually believed these anonymous statements, I refer them to the words my father told me when I was just a wee lad: “Don’t believe everything you read.” To that I’d add, “especially online.”

A good moral lesson, but what does that do for the non-admitted student?

Schmidt wants to answer as follows, I think: The rational, utility-maximizing 17th law firm follows Old Man Schmidt’s good advice and doesn’t believe what’s written online… does hire the applicant… and does benefit from that decision. In the long run, the other 16 do what they did after generations of not hiring Jewish applicants, and realize other firms are stealing a march on them because of their irrational hiring practices, and start hiring qualified Jews, or in this case qualified victims of anonymous defamation, because it is in their economic interest to do so. A good, invisible-hand, who-needs-the-state answer to irrational discrimination.

Could be. That’s a good answer, Eric. Meanwhile, though, the long run often feels like a place in an economist’s dream. By the time the white-shoe firms started hiring Jews, the Jews had found homes in their “own” law firms, many of which are the most powerful firms in the world today. In New York terms, it was ultimately competitive pressure from the Weil Gotshals and Wachtell Liptons that opened the door for my fellow one-time pariahs at places such as Cravath Swaine & Moore and Davis Polk & Wardwell. That process took nearly a century from the time that Jews started graduating from law schools in numbers.

Now, what’s the analogy for victims of online defamation? Colonies of other fellow Internet fallout victims? Perhaps an answer will reveal itself faster than a 100 years; perhaps not only disease, but remedy, spreads faster in Internet time. Perhaps.

Posted in Blogophilia, Past is prologue, Stragety | 2 Comments »

They knew

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 21, 2007

alfred-e-neuman.jpgNew research documents World War II-era Germans going on what we might call genocide tours. Chilling.

What’s more chilling, of course, is the point I made before — even if we’d known, too — known that well — it wouldn’t have made a difference. Just as it wouldn’t now.

Posted in Past is prologue | Leave a Comment »