Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Statute of limitations

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 14, 2007

Does World War II give us a free pass on all foreign-policy decisions for the rest of time? I don’t think so. But many hawks (I am a hawk), including Democratic Representative Tom Lantos, do. First, via James Taranto today, the perfectly good part.

“I am so glad that the era of Jacques Chirac and Chancellor Schroeder in Germany is now gone,” [California’s Rep. Tom] Lantos said to applause.

He said when the United States asked Schroeder to support its decision to go to war in Iraq “he told us where to go.”

“I referred to him as a political prostitute, now that he’s taking big checks from (Russian President Vladimir) Putin. But the sex workers in my district objected, so I will no longer use that phrase,” Lantos said. . . .

Fair enough. I like the sound of this. This Lantos, he’s a Democrat? Yes, he’s a hated “Democratic Hawk,” and indeed if there are any such things left he seems to be an excellent specimen. Oh, he co-sponsored the surrender resolution in February — yes, I guess I about get it. Anyway — here’s where he loses me:

Lantos said Chirac “should go down to the Normandy beaches. He should see those endless rows of white marble crosses and stars of David representing young Americans who gave their lives for the freedom of France.”

I’m sure that would do Chirac a world of good. But how on earth does that mean that half a century later, France is obligated to support every foreign policy choice the United States makes?

This is such an intellectually dishonest argument, and at the same time so rich in jingoism, that only a politician could make it.

I think if you roll back the obligations and chip-cashing calculus, the U.S. owes about as much to France, which made victory in the Revolutionary War possible, as France does to us. But both actions are part of history. France has its own rotten, swinish and, yes, whore-like national interests, and will pursue them as we pursue our noble, selfless ones.  So much the better if that country recognizes, as it should, that its interests in the long run are indeed closer to ours than its previous leadership has believed.

But World War II? Very old war. Way over.  Our foreign policy arguments have to be made on the merits — at least with our allies.

Posted in Euroids, Politics and Poker | 5 Comments »

Brooklyn Bridge station

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 13, 2007


Brooklyn Bridge station

Originally uploaded by Ron Coleman.

This is where you get off and on the train if you’re going to the New York County Supreme Court or the Southern District of New York federal courthouse. So it’s the subway station most likely to have people with big square briefcases waiting in it.

Posted in Metropolis | Leave a Comment »

More on the bear

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 13, 2007

czar-nicholas-ii.jpg

I’ve been following the New Russian Bellicosity for a while now. Instapundit points to this good, but too short, Strategy Page article that tells it like it is. In other words, he sees it the way I do (emphasis added):

The really bad news is, most Russians are still not aware of how screwed up their Soviet era military was. There are two reasons for this. First, Russians take for granted how their armed forces operates. Russians complain about the brutality and incompetence in the military, but that’s all they’ve ever known. Second, Russians remember fondly that their ramshackle armed forces defeated the Germans during World War II. What the Russians play down is how much the Germans lost World War II in Russia, rather than being beaten. The Germans made a lot of serious mistakes during the war, while the Russians got their act together. What Russians fail to realize is that the Soviet Union was an accidental, and largely imaginary, superpower. Russia has long employed large scale deception, and the Soviet Union continued this on a sustained basis. Military weaknesses (poor training and readiness) were hidden, and strengths (sheer number of weapons and troops) emphasized. But as was seen many times (from Budapest in 1956, to Chechnya in 1994), the Soviet military system produced little in the way of real military power. Soviet weapons, as impressive as they appeared to be, always came out a distant second when they were used against Western ones. The main thing that kept the Soviet military reputation going was the need of Western militaries to make the Soviet Union look strong, in order to justify high Western military budgets.

The one effective weapon the Soviets did have were their nuclear armed ballistic missiles. Better maintained than the rest of the military, enough of this missile fleet would work, if used, to devastate Western nations. Russia still has a large part of that nuclear arsenal. But that does not make Russians feel like a superpower. That’s because Russia no longer has the huge fleet, air force and army. And that’s because this huge force was all an expensive illusion, which was disbanded in the 1990s, once it was obvious what a waste it all was. But the big thing that’s missing is the size of the Soviet Union. Over half the population of the Soviet Union were not Russian, and did not want to be part of the Soviet Union. Most of these people got their wish in 1991, when the Soviet Union came apart. Many Russians want to undo that, but they cannot. It took Russia over four centuries to build that empire, and the inept Soviet Bureaucrats a few weeks to lose it all. An increasing number of Russians want it back, but are unwilling to confront how they lost it in the first place, or why rebuilding the empire is an uncertain and dangerous enterprise. This is all very dangerous stuff.

A lot of people will disagree with the “Germany beat itself” suggestion, but not all — especially German historians. But his overall point is hard to refute.

It seems likely that Putin’s recent tough talk is opportunistic — he is aware of Bush’s political weakness and international-pariah status and wants to see what he can get. But Condi Rice seems up to handling the delicate psychological game needed to keep the Bear from doing something stupid. And, revealingly, Europe is not responding to Russian scare tactics the way it did in the old days — in some cases, far from it. This gives reason to hope. Isn’t that a nice change?

Posted in Euroids, Stragety | 1 Comment »

A small sacrifice

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 13, 2007

I wrote this piece for Beyond BT, a blog focusing on newcomers to observant Judaism (or baalei teshuvah). I am not so new — it has been over 20 years — but the issues are always there.

I don’t use a lot of undefined terms besides ones everyone reading that blog would know, such as baalei teshuvah and frum (the Yiddish word related to “prim” that means, as prim’s twin “proper” would suggest, orthodox).  Tell me if I missed one.

If you don’t like very introspective, don’t click on the link.

Posted in Faith and Works | Leave a Comment »

“Safe booze”

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 12, 2007

Speaking of underage vices:  Should parents who made their house a “safe haven” for underage drinking be penalized harshly by the law merely because what they did was illegal?  What if it kind of made utilitarian sense to let them get stoned at home?  Good give and take on this question over at Overlawyered (the comments — the item itself is the third bullet on the list at this link).

Posted in Lex scripta, O Mores! | Leave a Comment »

This can’t help

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 12, 2007

Star-Telegram.com:

Three National Guardsmen assigned to the Texas-Mexico border were accused of running an immigrant smuggling ring after 24 immigrants were found inside a van that one of them was driving, a U.S. attorney said Monday.The three, arrested late Thursday and Friday, were arraigned Monday on a federal charge of conspiring to transport illegal immigrants.

If we weren’t just totally cynical at this point, the disgustingness of this would be breathtaking. But their cynicism must be a product of that of their employer, who has made enforcement of the immigration laws an international joke and the efforts of the troops on the border nothing more than window dressing.

Having said that, I certainly would like to see the proverbial book tossed right upside their respective heads.

Posted in Americana | 2 Comments »

The Honorable Bill Mathesius simply doesn’t give a hoot

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 11, 2007

And thus he self-destructs his judicial career in style. Judge Bill Mathesius, who was Mercer County, New Jersey’s king for what I thought was life when I was spending the second half of my childhood there, is flaming out big time on the New Jersey state bench. You just don’t see a judge write stuff like this:

I authored the opinion – “opinion” being what I thought the operative word – known as State v. Harris in October, 2002 where I was indiscreet enough to question our State’s and court’s muddling of the death penalty. I indecorously took note of the court energy and millions of taxpayer dollars which are wasted on a dysfunctional morass. Don’t try to look my opinion up because it has been deemed “wholly devoid of any function in the judicial discourse of our death penalty jurisprudence” [4] by Justice LaVecchia, the author of her very own State v. Harris “opinion.” She also allowed “[t]he balance of the court’s statements contain what only can be described as outrageous [5], sarcastic [6], and pejorative [7] comments about this State’s death penalty system and this Court’s capital jurisprudence [8], including gratuitous personal attacks against current and former members of the Court.” [9] Consequently, she proclaimed, “such statements deserve no place in the published decisions of this State.” [10][11] The Justice’s caustic and anti-intellectual comments belie the fact that with her own 100-plus additional pages of deathless prose, she affirmed my conclusions regarding the substantive issues of Harris.

[12]Notwithstanding, with Harris, I painted the bull’s-eye on my own back – no one else to blame.

I failed to sufficiently take into account that there are those justices and judges whom, as the result of little more than political happenstance, become inured to a daily showering of reverence such that it mutates into an entitlement. In judiciary circles, independent thought which deviates from the ex cathedra from above is unwelcome. [13]

By the Justice’s decree, I became then, and as far as I know, the only judge in the United States who has had a written opinion stricken (imperiously, in my view) from the “judicial discourse,” [14] such as it is. [15] For a court – never mind the Supreme Court of New Jersey – to so indulge was, at the very least, a violation of democratic etiquette, if not a rather disingenuous expedition into censorship [16], seemingly antithetical to any notion of the First Amendment [17] of the Constitution of the United States of America [18]. This is, by the way, the very same Court that regularly (and proudly) expands Constitutional rights or discovers new ones lying here and about [19].

So it goes.

And so I was brought up on charges by the Advisory Committee on Judicial Conduct (ACJC) [20], a judicial swat team of scolds led, interestingly enough by former Justice Alan Handler [21], mostly alleging my bringing of the “judicial office into disrepute.” [22][23] Moi?? Say it isn’t so.

Ouch. And, lastly, she determined that my statements “reveal a disdain for defendant.” Disrepute?

He actually has a valid point in there, but he’s a very bad writer, and that does not help. Via Above the Law (to whom I myself sent the original item a while ago).

Posted in Lex scripta, Sisyphus | 4 Comments »

Trial Term Part 15

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 11, 2007


Trial Term Part 15

Originally uploaded by Ron Coleman.
I settled a case in this courtroom a week ago today. We weren’t trying it here — it was adjacent to where the hearing was supposed to be, it was vacant, and the judge of the house was happy to literally lend us his good offices.

This is the courthouse that’s always featured on Law and Order. The federal court is right next door, and in fact, having more business in the latter, I frequently find myself walking past or, if the cameras aren’t rolling, through setups for filming in Foley Square. They love those famous long, long steps in front of the courthouses.

When I’m in court that’s when I feel as if my life is a television show, and in a good way.

Posted in Lex scripta, Metropolis | Leave a Comment »

Good Shabbos

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 8, 2007

This week’s Torah portion is Sh’lach.

June sunset NYC

Originally uploaded by Ron Coleman.

Posted in Metropolis | 1 Comment »

The Big Lie

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 8, 2007

We card


I spend too much time in convenience stores buying drinks and snacks. But it gives me lots of opportunity to survey the two main activities that take place there.

The first is people with evidently — from the looks of them — limited disposal income buying lottery tickets, all too knowledgeably. Economists and other wags call lotteries a “tax on the stupid,” for good reason.

The second is the sale of cigarettes, at least half of which are sold to minors. I have never seen anyone asked for identification in one of these stores, which obviously make a large part of their money on illegal, open and notorious, cigarette sales to people who you can tell are underage from across the street. I’ve never seen anyone busted for selling cigarettes to kids, either. Yet these stores are festooned with “We Card” and similar warning signs.

The best one of all is the decal next to the cash register that tells you what your birthday has to be in order to buy cigs. Can you imagine someone not knowing whether he qualifies as 19 or not? The purpose of the decal, of course, is to coach kids as to how to lie to buy tobacco illegally.

Cynicism? Not a little. Does this breed a heightened disrespect, not to say contempt, for the law among a class that, by virtue of its choice to become a smoker, has already demonstrated an unhealthy disregard not only for convention but for common sense and an instinct for self-preservation? Hard not to say so.

Posted in Lex scripta, O Mores!, Sisyphus | 6 Comments »