Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Politics and Poker’ Category

Memorial Day

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 27, 2007

The greatest ever Memorial Day words were uttered not on the eve of summer, but in November:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Posted in Americana, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus | 1 Comment »

Fred Thompson, damn it

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 22, 2007

There’s nothing not to like about Fred Thompson, okay?

But I still haven’t seen the steak. Sizzle, yes. Yet he’s perceived as being so unconnected to the miasma of Washington insiderism (as if he never served in the Senate?) that even smart guys like Glenn Reynolds become almost thoughtless boosters. Check this out:

FRED THOMPSON ON CORRUPTION AND THE U.N.: “When Fidel Castro and Kim Jong Il have as much say in U.N. matters as the entire populations of Poland and New Zealand, you’re going to have problems.”

I’m sorry. This is not original. It is not insightful. In fact, it’s not even bold: “You’re going to have problems”?

Fred — Glenn? — and, yes, NRO? This pedestrian observation is something any conservative, or indeed intellectually honest regardless of political stripe, observer of international relations and the UN could have made and probably has made, in some form or another, for the last 20 years.  Yet for this he gets a syndicated column, which is picked up on NRO; a featured quote on Instapundit; millions of adoring right-wing bloggers?

Come on!

What is your policy prescription, Senator? Do we leave the UN? Defund it? Sue it? Level it? Audit it (again)?

I love Fred’s stage presence. I love his magical powers. He’s friends with a former boss of mine. He seems like a decent conservative.

Far be it from me to ask a question so banal as, “Where’s the beef?” But I’m at the barbecue. I’ve got my plate. The bun is open. I smell something cooking. But my stomach, she is growling. And the sun is arching into the west.

Posted in Blogophilia, Medialites, Politics and Poker | 15 Comments »

Throw the bums out

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 22, 2007

Who isn’t disgusted with the whole load of them?  Nothing is needed more than term limits.  Mark Tapscott agrees (via the Captain) and thinks that what the Internet has done for media, it can do for politics:

What’s needed is a massive and continuing infusion of new blood — citizen legislators — in Congress. The careerists will never agree to that, of course, so it will have to be imposed from the outside. That’s where the Internet, the wisdom of crowds, term limits and a potential new post-partisan political movement converge.

Of this, I am skeptical.   Media are just that:  Media, i.e., conduits.  Freed of technical and economic constraints, information and expression can now flow as never before.

Politics, though also a base of power as the established media powers still are, is not a medium at all.  It is an accretion of power and institutions.  That power is given back to the governed only in the most grudging fashion, and usually while at the same time it usurps more with the other hand.

This is not necessarily so bad.  Government should have stability.  Change in societal expectations about government is best made gradually, not only because of “social order” but because massive economic and social decisions are made on the basis of reasonable expectations about the regime.

Fine.  That’s what a constitution is for.  Now let’s fix ours, using its own mechanisms, and nail down term limits for legislatures, once and for all.

Posted in Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

Down with me!

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 17, 2007

KNBC reports:

Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa and Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez are among those expected to join immigrant-rights activists Thursday for a march and rally to denounce the actions of Los Angeles riot police at a May Day rally at MacArthur Park.

The debasement of politics, leadership, statesmanship:  Protest against your own administration!  Nothing is beyond the demagogue.

What a … riot.

Posted in Politics and Poker | 11 Comments »

Fred Thompson, damn it

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 16, 2007

Two things. Maybe three:

  1. The good thing about being obscure is you can change your find and pretty much no one will call you on it. (That is another version of pretty much no one will care, true, but every blog is a vanity project, at the end of the day, isn’t it?)
  2. Does this mean Instapundit is part of the Fred campaign? Hard to get much more front-and-center on an endorsement than embedding a campaign video on that blog.
  3. If you’re not up to date on the facts about Fred Thompson, click here.

Okay, and as to number one? I still like Rudy. But I am convinced there is so much animosity toward his pro-abortion position that he cannot get the nomination.

UPDATE:  “Who do you think the Left fears most?”

Posted in Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »

Red State insurgency

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 11, 2007

TheHill.com reports that the boys at Red State are mad as hell and they’re not going to take it any more:

The editor of a popular conservative blog declared “war” on the GOP House leadership following the decision of Republican members to appoint Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Calif.) temporarily to a powerful House panel.“The House Republican Leadership just does not get it and they will not take us seriously until we flex our muscle against them,” wrote Erick Erickson, editor of http://www.redstate.com. “We must fight the House GOP and we must fight today.

Here’s the link. I like the sound of this. Calvert has already written in — first he sent a staffer; when that didn’t work he “submitted” a pure-PR press release in his own name — begging for mercy.

He might be entirely worthy of it. He might be a saint on earth. It doesn’t matter. The GOP leadership is blind, deaf and dumb to what’s going on politically both at the top and at the bottom, and if Rep. Calvert has to be the sacrifice here, so be it. Nothing personal, Gentleman from California.

Where do I sign up?

Posted in Politics and Poker | 3 Comments »

Rudy squares the circle

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 10, 2007

The Dawn Patrol explains why Rudy had to give to Planned Parenthood:

Giuliani explained that he was personally opposed to his contributions but made them as a matter of conscience. “I cannot impose my morality upon anyone, including myself,” he said. He added that if elected president there would be nothing he would hate more than appointing pro-abortion judges to the Supreme Court.

Ooh, I hate when that happens!

Posted in Jocularity, Politics and Poker | 7 Comments »

Obama sliding into oblivion

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 9, 2007

Alex Beam:

I wouldn’t mind living in a country where Barack Obama is president. Brains; candor; charisma; ambition hitched to a work ethic; I admire those qualities. But frankly, the people who’ve ponied up $4,600 for Obama in this election cycle might as well have piled the money on the kitchen table and set fire to it. Or donated it to the Audubon Society, which has a lot better chance of being in business a year from now than Obama’s presidential campaign.If you listen closely, the silent dog whistle is already blowing for the Obama candidacy, and the tune it is playing is taps.

I thought he just wasn’t ready. Beam suggests he just isn’t up to it. The closer you look, so do Obama’s own words and actions.

Posted in Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

The religion of politics

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 8, 2007

I woke up the morning after the [2004] election … and cried for three straight days. … Not because my candidate lost, which he had, but because of what it meant for the solutions to global warming.

Sean Bannion on the tears of Laurie David, distinguished booker for David Letterman, wife to the real life (i.e., immensely wealthy) George Constanza and generator of thousands of private-jet hours:

I honestly don’t know what it is about left-of-center politics that makes every single political burp something devastating and personal. It only seems to make sense when you consider left-of-center politics (and especially the global warming jihad) as a religion complete with its own dogma, saints and unprovable beliefs.

Good point (especially on global warming and, regrettably to me, especially among assimilated Hebrews like Laurie David). Now, why don’t we see that on the right? Well, right-wingers fall into two broad types: Religious ones and the other ones. Religious ones, well, they have religion — or, if you must insist on bringing up the fakes and the hypocrites, they have a vocabulary of religion that spares us comments such as David’s. Religious people have faith in God, take their complaints to God, and if they’re fakes, well, you can be darned sure they’re not crying over election results.

That was easy.

And non-religious righties? Well, they have very good ideas about government, frequently. Indeed they’re often the smartest knives in the drawer. But at the end of the day, ah, they — typified by the brilliant but ultimately hollow P.J. O’Rourke, who’s quoted at Cold Fury in the link above — just don’t really care that much at all about any of it as long as they can pay the rent and shoot at cans in the back. They’re certainly not about to cry about an election if they’ve got a nice gig at National Review Online or an advance from Grove Atlantic.

That’s my working thesis, anyway. It’s also possible they’re just not big babies.

Posted in Faith and Works, Politics and Poker | 7 Comments »

Hedging on the truth

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 8, 2007

I said earlier this year that what was going to doom John Edwards — besides everything else — was the obvious contradiction between his running on a class-envy platform and his hair his immense wealth and conspicuously wealthy lifestyle.

Now this:

Edwards said it’s legitimate to ask questions about whether there is a contradiction between campaigning against poverty while working for a hedge fund that is designed to make rich people richer. He said the job was a compliment to his position as the head of a poverty center at the University of North Carolina.

“I didn’t feel like I understand, and to be honest with you still learning right now, sort of the relationship between that world and the way money moves in this country through financial markets,” Edwards said.

Hypocritical… cynical… and a complete BS artist!

Posted in Politics and Poker | 3 Comments »