Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Politics and Poker’ Category

The coronation

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 24, 2009

That’s right:  We’re coronating the hitherto unknown M.A. Lamascoloas as i-knight-theepundit king for this gem sent to Glenn Reynolds in response to Insty’s observation that, gee, whaddya know, Chris Matthews is having his doubts about the Black JFK — about six months too late:

Matthews has himself to blame. I want Obama to succeed. I want our country to succeed. I disagree with 85% of Obama’s positions, but I want him and our country to succeed. He can’t do that if he hasn’t been tested. One of the best tests is a campaign. But he didn’t have one of those, he had a coronation. Matthews and his colleagues across the media let our country down. They gave Obama no vetting whatsoever. Now Matthews wants to complain? It’s a little late for that.

How knavish to say such a thing!  Of royalty you have no share; you are no knight, nor gentleman nor decent commoner.

Off with your head, M.A.!

Posted in Medialites, Narcissus Rex, Past is prologue, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

“They’ve got an extra bathroom in a house they can’t afford to live in”

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 19, 2009

The Chicago tea party — born of a trading floor harangue by a CNBC business editor?

They’re screaming about this, by the way.

Posted in Gelt, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »

Through a glass, darkly

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 14, 2009

Instapundit:

TRANSPARENCY: An “Off-the-Record speech” at the National Press Club? It’s a tribute to Dr. Strangelove: “You can’t do reporting here! This is the press club!”

Well, I followed the link and I was pretty confused.  Isn’t the National Press Club’s most famous event — the Gridiron Dinner — famously “off the record,” at least “on the record”? [“Reporting” fail!  Ironic, yeah.  See comments. — RDC]  What’s the big deal here?  I eventually figured it out, though, and the below is a comment I left at the linked-to story at the Knoxville News Sentinel.

I wish the blog reporting on this issue were a little more clear here, actually. Lots of events involving reporters and people involved in media are off the record, including events of the National Press Club. So the way this was reported, and the comments here, don’t really add up. There’s nothing inherently offensive about that; in fact, a lot of good can come from people being able to talk off the record from time to time.

This really is a story, however, and it really is a problem — although you wouldn’t know it to read this item, or Instapundit’s. Here’s an excerpt from Donna Leinwand letter that, first, sets up the procedural issue:

As you know, the National Press Club is hosting but not sponsoring this event. Georgetown University’s School of Continuing Studies is renting a room at the Club for the conference. As such, it is the prerogative of Georgetown, Mr. Plouffe and your bureau to impose whatever ground rules you prefer for his remarks.

Right. It’s their ball. She goes on in her letter to complain, along the lines of commenters here, about the hypocrisy, etc., which is all well and good. It’s true, but it’s dog bites man, you know? But to my mind, the pointy edge of this story is this:

Plouffe, who has been on the speaking circuit promoting his forthcoming book, “The Audacity to Win”, was the keynote speaker on Thursday at a public policy luncheon sponsored by Georgetown University and Politico. Every event at the two-day program had been promoted as open to media coverage, but Georgetown on Wednesday told media representatives that Plouffe’s speech would be off the record.

Both quotes are from here.

Now you can understand the problem. It was a bait and switch whereby not only attendees but even sponsors were told, a day before the speech and after people had taken the trouble to set up the event, promote it, get access to it, travel to it, etc., that no less than the keynote speaker himself was changing the ground rules. That’s dirty pool, and that is what elevates this story from more media- enabled media-evasion (for is this administration not to be a replay of Camelot, without of course the unhappy ending?) to a particularly cynical and nasty show of arrogance.

Posted in Medialites, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

Bail me out, Scotty

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 10, 2009

Or something like that.  I took a couple of days to visit with my parents in their southern Florida home.  It was worth doom-postercoming down here just to be the second-youngest person for miles around; I would be the youngest but my kid brother came along, too (it was his idea actually).  My parents are just kvelling over having us here and I’ll say this much:  Nice weather sure is… nice.

Even with all the electronica around I think it’s easier to ignore what’s going on in Washington from here, though not what’s going on on Wall Street — my dad is plugged in as long as “the mockit” is open.  Well, and these days those two things are pretty firmly connected to each other.

I have to tell you, though, I was so inclined to like a lot about Barack Obama, all things considered.  In a way, I wasn’t even too unhappy with this hard and radical shift rightward on a lot of national-security and secrecy type issues, which while they make great fodder for Instapundit (and appropriately so — meet the new boss, yada yada yada), also moved Obama more in my direction on most of those things.  The fact that all this infuriates Obama’s “progressive” supporters makes it kind of fun, too.  Why, they literally can’t win for winning!

And, the cynicism and hypocrisy of it all?  Well, come on, folks!  The only people shocked and surprised by that are the ones who not only thought Obama was the new JFK, but think that by virtue of his display of phenomenal cynicism and hypocrisy, he demonstrates that he isn’t the new JFK!

Come on, folks!

But I may just end up utterly unable to get past the “stimulus” bill.  I thought this Obama was a fellow I would disagree with politically, and perhaps very fundamentally, and critically, but that he was someone I would be able to respect.  And I am looking at this swollen, irresponsible, reckless “stimulus package” and I cannot believe that something so radically and obviously bad for the country is about to be rammed through Congress and begin the process of generating the largest, ugliest economic sucking sound in the history of Keynesianism.

Imagine an Administration that in two weeks manages to make the profligate fiscal irresponsibility of government during the Bush years look, well, bush league.

What a drag.  And tomorrow afternoon I leave the palm trees behind, too, and play out the rest of winter in New York.  It could be a longer, colder one than it even seemed.

Posted in Gelt, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

It’s that time of day

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 4, 2009

Yes, even a stopped clock is right twice a day, and it’s that time of day of the United Nations — actually describing objective facts related to the Israeli-Arab conflict that depart from the “noble savages” script regarding Palestinians.  Get this:

Christopher Gunness, a spokesman for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency, said Hamas policemen broke into an aid warehouse in Gaza City on Tuesday evening and confiscated 3,500 blankets and more than 400 packages of food.

“They were armed, they seized this, they took it by force,” Gunness said, terming the seizure “absolutely unacceptable.” . . .

“Does anyone really think that the Americans, who are our single largest donor, or the Europeans, who are our largest multination donor, would give us aid in the generous way they do if they thought that aid would go to terrorists?” Gunness said.

Yeah, that’s right:  They also acknowledged an American contribution in a public statement.  This guy Gunness, I figure he’s on a bread line by the weekend, no?

And Hamas?  Same old, same old — classic fascist Big Lie speak:

The Hamas government demanded an “immediate apology” from the U.N. “for spreading false news,” Hamas spokesman Taher Nunu said.

Amazing.  Keep this up and even Jimmy Carter will be embarrassed by these guys!

Posted in Euroids, Oppression, Orient, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

“War and Decision”

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 4, 2009

John Hawkins reviews Douglas Feith’s War and Decision at Right Wing News .  Two of my favorite bullet points:

  • The CIA comes across as frighteningly, almost unbelievably incompetent and petty, even though they often didn’t inform the people relying on their advice of how little they really had to base their opinions on.
  • The worst criticism, however, was reserved for the State Department in general and Colin Powell, in particular. In Feith’s view, Powell was an arrogant, passive aggressive, disloyal bureaucrat who never said that he opposed going to war, but dragged his feet at every opportunity and fought policy battles through leaks to the press.

Yoiks! Sounds like good reading.

I wonder if government is too dumb to handle stuff like policy and war.

Posted in Orient, Past is prologue, Politics and Poker, Stragety | 2 Comments »

The $64,000 (before taxes) question

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 3, 2009

Roland Dodds wants to know:  “Do any Democrats pay taxes?”

Well, not the rich ones who are in politics, it appears.  And why should they?  It’s not as if tax evasion is slowing down any of their political careers or anything.

It’s different when you’re on the side of the angels, after all.  Ever see a cat with a halo and a harp trudging over to H&R Block?  I thought not.

UPDATE: It’s a growing refrain.

NEW UPDATE:  Scott Ott reports that they’ve got it figured out now:

Just minutes after two of President Barack Obama’s nominees withdrew today over failure to pay their tax obligations, the president reportedly requested and received from the IRS the official list of wealthy Democrats who have filed accurate tax returns, and whose accounts are paid up. . . .

From now on, the White House said, the nomination process will start with a “white list” from the Internal Revenue Service.

Posted in Gelt, Lex scripta, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

Remorse for what’s lost

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 1, 2009

An honest assessment over at Post Secret.

Posted in Heart and spirit, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

Obama versus the press?

Posted by Ron Coleman on January 23, 2009

Not really.  That’s what I’m supposed to write, right?  Based on this little gem of a story:

President Obama made a surprise visit to the White House press corps Thursday night, but got agitated when he was faced with a substantive question.

Asked how he could reconcile a strict ban on lobbyists in his administration with a Deputy Defense Secretary nominee who lobbied for Raytheon, Obama interrupted with a knowing smile on his face.

“Ahh, see,” he said, “I came down here to visit. See this is what happens. I can’t end up visiting with you guys and shaking hands if I’m going to get grilled every time I come down here.”

Pressed further by the Politico reporter about his Pentagon nominee, William J. Lynn III, Obama turned more serious, putting his hand on the reporter’s shoulder and staring him in the eye.

“Alright, come on” he said, with obvious irritation in his voice. “We will be having a press conference at which time you can feel free to [ask] questions. Right now, I just wanted to say hello and introduce myself to you guys – that’s all I was trying to do.”

So because I’m a conservative I’m supposed to jump on this, right?  “Ah the honeymoon’s over!  Let’s see how the Chosen One handles the real spotlight, eh!”

I’m with Obama on this.  If this had been my guy, I know I’d be saying, “Give ’em hell!  Screw those self-appointed wiseguys!”  That’s what we’d say every time the Gipper pretended not to hear the loaded questions Sam Donaldson would shout out at him.  Why is this different — because it’s more sincere?

Not every moment in life has to be political, contentious, adversarial.  Not every reaction has to be spun.

He’ll have to answer the question.  It’s a fair one.

But he hasn’t even been on the job two full days.  Can’t he find his way to the water cooler before he has to start with the gotchas?

Can’t we have a little just plain humanity, just a little bit?

Posted in Medialites, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

The People of Tomorrow

Posted by Ron Coleman on January 21, 2009

Jack over at the The Missal has some thoughts about the Obama Era and the people who live in it.

Posted in Heart and spirit, Politics and Poker, Style | 1 Comment »