Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Americana’ Category

The White House gets lonelier

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 31, 2007

It must be May 32nd. My utterly alienated blogfather — Andrew Sullivan — and his (says me) replacement, Glenn Reynolds, are on the same page about the White House’s unreal attitude toward the immigration bill. Yes, we’re all disgusted: “It’s the arrogance and condescension that finally makes your blood boil.”

It’s not as if it hasn’t happened before. It’s of a piece with the Bush weakness for cronyism, which is a family trait not entirely unrelated to loyalty.

Now who could be less of a crony to the Bushes than a Mexican immigrant pulling weeds from your garden? Well, some people insist that this is about President Bush’s strong compassionate feeling for the unfortunate Mexican immigrants who just want to make a life for themselves. Who am I to gainsay that? I don’t know the President. But the cronyism I wrote about at the link above, which put the Harriet Meiers debacle into the context of the Dick Cheney nomination, can be added to the President’s insistence on standing by a mediocre Attorney General, to get the following sum:

George Bush is a man of principle. Popularity polls and even congressional elections do not sway him from what he believes is the right course of action — say, in Iraq. But being, in that way, the anti-Bill Clinton, George Bush relies on a small inner galaxy to direct his inclinations. The result is an inappropriate amount of trust in his inner circle, and almost a contempt — or deafness, perhaps — to popular sentiment, maybe even iced with enjoyment of swimming upstream.

That’s a lonely place to be, especially when your hunches don’t work out so well, and especially in your lame duck years in office. Bill Clinton would not lead politically; defiance of the popular will was only something he did while signing midnight pardons on the way out the door. George Bush leads with his heart to the extent that his White House condescends even to its grass roots supporters. Unlike Bill Clinton’s all-night carnival, the Bush White House seems like a lonely world to live in, but for the governed, it may be worse.

Next time, can we get something in between?

Posted in Americana, Politics and Poker | 3 Comments »

Serve me, or else.

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 31, 2007

Reuters says that eHarmony has been sued for running its business pursuant to its own moral — or business — compass:

The popular online dating service eHarmony was sued on Thursday for refusing to offer its services to gays, lesbians and bisexuals.

A lawsuit alleging discrimination based on sexual orientation was filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of Linda Carlson, who was denied access to eHarmony because she is gay.

I am sure she was not “denied access to eHarmony.” From the sound of it, she was denied the provision of services eHarmony doesn’t provide: Homosexual dating. How does eHarmony explain itself?

eHarmony could not immediately be reached for comment. Commenting in the past on eHarmony’s gay and lesbian policy, [Dr. Neil Clark] Warren has said that he does not know the dynamics of same-sex relationships but he expects the principles to be different.

You’ve heard the commercials, probably. Dr. Warren, in his strained voice, talking about his touchy-feely personalized matchup process. You can buy into that or not; but what he sells is what he claims to know. Homosexual relationships, he says, he does not know. Tough luck, Dr. Warren. California law requires you to know.

This is particularly interesting because, again, contrary to the “denied access” claim, homosexuals have by all indications not been denied access — they just want a new division of the company started for them:

Lawyers bringing the action said they believed it was the first lawsuit of its kind against eHarmony, which has long rankled the gay community with its failure to offer a “men seeking men” or “women seeking women” option.

The plaintiffs here are actually arguing that eHarmony is obligated not just to open up its existing service to people of all sexual predilections. It is requiring eHarmony to actually provide new services that it claims neither an interest nor any degree of expertise in, and which may require an outlay of millions of dollars. Let’s not even get into the moral preferences of the owners and management, which are presumed irrelevant by laws which outlaw discrimination against homosexuals or, in this case, may mandate the provision of special services to them.

Where are the libertarian defenders of free enterprise? We’ll see.

UPDATE:  The heavy lifters.

Posted in Americana, Lex scripta, O Mores! | 18 Comments »

Duke netters net some justice

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 30, 2007

This sounds like the right thing to do:

The NCAA has granted Duke’s request for an extra year of eligibility for its men’s lacrosse players following rape allegations that led to the cancellation of much of last season.The decision affects 33 players who were not seniors during the 2006 season, and it grants them a fifth year of eligibility regardless of whether they play at Duke or another school. The announcement Wednesday came just two days after the Blue Devils lost to Johns Hopkins by a goal in the NCAA championship game.

“These individuals were involved in an unusual circumstance that we believe warrants providing them the opportunity to complete their four years of competition,” said Jennifer Strawley, NCAA director of student-athlete reinstatement and membership services.

Of course most people — even lacrosse players — aren’t interested in five years of college.  And the real bad guy here was not the NCAA; it was Duke.

When does Duke step up?

Posted in Americana | 1 Comment »

Memorial Day

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 27, 2007

The greatest ever Memorial Day words were uttered not on the eve of summer, but in November:

Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.

Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this.

But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate — we can not consecrate — we can not hallow — this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us — that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion — that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain — that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom — and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth.

Posted in Americana, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus | 1 Comment »

The wealth of nations

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 25, 2007

Instapundit writes:

I’VE NOTED REPEATEDLY that gas prices don’t seem to be high enough to affect people’s behavior. Apparently they’d have to increase a lot more to do that:

In 1962 — a year writ large in the popular imagination as the quintessential year of muscle cars and cheap gasoline thanks to the movie American Graffiti — gasoline prices averaged 31 cents per gallon. When we factor changes in disposable income, today’s gas would have to cost $4.48 to be a comparable burden.

The public likewise thinks of 1972 as the last year of energy innocence prior to the rise of OPEC and the onset of shortage. Fuel prices in 1972 averaged 36 cents per gallon, a hefty $2.77 per gallon in today’s terms. While still high, this price is not all that different than the prices we were paying earlier in the year.

No wonder people are still driving fast and often.

Nnyess. And a lot depends on how you figure the “today’s terms” number. You can do a simple inflation-factor multiplication — how many of today’s dollars buy a widget today compared to how many did in 1962 or 1972. But that ignores the wealth effect, namely that even if today’s gas is more expensive that it was then, almost every one of us has (even in real terms) a lot more money to spend on gas than we did then. Will people who spend $20 for a music CD, $50 for ticket to the ballgame or $25 for a haircut really drive less just because a tank of gas costs $45 instead of $35 or $30?

I don’t know about you, but the thought never occurs to me.

UPDATE: My point, Glenn! (He really needs me to connect the dots…)

Posted in Americana, Gelt | 35 Comments »

Beneath the citiy, two hearts beat

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 21, 2007

Soul engines running through a night so tender…

Oh wait, a minute did I say sould?  Heart?  No, no — this underground city is for freshly laundered character costumes!

Posted in Americana | Leave a Comment »

Out of the shadows

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 20, 2007

Instapundit writes about the immigration debate, quoting Mark Steyn to the effect that immigrant advocates who seek to allow their constituents to exit “the shadows” don’t really want to exit them so much that they have to pay taxes like the rest of us — and that, amazingly (but not), the new immigration proposal offers them just that:

[T]his captures the disconnect between Washington officialdom’s view of citizenship, and the view held by actual citizens, something that I think is at the core of the immigration debate. More than hostility to illegal immigrants, I think a lot of the backlash is driven by the sense that Washington insiders don’t really value what ordinary law-abiding people do by way of living their lives and, you know, abiding by the law.

A nice point.  That and rising hostility to just about everything about “Washington insiders.”

Posted in Americana, Lex scripta | Leave a Comment »

Immigration “reform”?

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 17, 2007

frito-bandito.jpgYeah, well, phooey. Check out the truth here:

Immigration: The Human Cost

Posted in Americana, Jocularity | 1 Comment »

59th Street Bridge with yacht

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 14, 2007

59th Street Bridge with yacht
It was perfect weather in Manhattan and during the late afternoon I had to slip out and decompress along the East River around 51st Street, where there’s a pedestrian bridge that goes over a local “dog park” and over the FDR Drive to a set of benches on the water.

The brackish water does me a lot of good, and whiile it’s not exactly quiet, the white noise generated by the passing cars on the FDR — punctuated by booming renditions of urban Top 40 — will, if you are a city mouse, substitute quite nicely for silence.

All and all a bracing diversion just a few blocks from the office.

Posted in Americana, Metropolis | Leave a Comment »

Class envy around the lakes

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 10, 2007

They make houses bigger in Minnesota. Interesting side point about the “Mary Tyler Moore House.”

Posted in Americana | Leave a Comment »