Sometimes Glenn Reynolds is positively charming in his lack of self awareness of why he has so much influence — and other times he almost seems to break through and “get it”!
Archive for the ‘Blogophilia’ Category
How’d I do that?
Posted by Ron Coleman on August 14, 2008
Posted in Blogophilia, Jocularity | Leave a Comment »
Talking to yourself
Posted by Ron Coleman on August 11, 2008
I never understood podcasting. Not at all. Evidently, Ann Althouse has seen the light and dropped her podcasts (yes, via IP), but part of her rationale is all the fun she’s having on “Bloggingheads,” which someone must watch. I think her commenter, Bruce, gets the real point:
I never liked the podcast or video format for blogging or anything like blogging. People who read blogs tend to read lots of them and I know I do a lot of skimming. Video is far too time consuming and linear for my tastes except for where video is the essence of the information such as a spectacular short event caught on video. Even then I like having a good summary of what I’m about to watch and how long it will take.
It’s like the difference between window shopping and having some sales person give you an uninterruptable five minute pitch about the particular product they want to sell you. No matter how wonderful and interesting that person and/or product might be, I tend to react like a cat being dragged into a bath tub full of water.
Thank you, Bruce. Why don’t most people realize that we may be interested in your message, but we don’t really want to hear about it?
Posted in Blogophilia, Medialites | 2 Comments »
Copyright law has been stood on its head and Bill Patry doffs his cap
Posted by Ron Coleman on August 5, 2008
Copyright doyen Bill Patry explains why he shut down his brilliant copyright law blog. Some of it had to do with his inability to prevent people from ascribing his personal views to his employer, Google. Some of it had to do with a sort of spiritual exhaustion (despite being a pretty spiritual guy). But naturally, this is the reason that got my attention:
Copyright law has abandoned its reason for being: to encourage learning and the creation of new works. Instead, its principal functions now are to preserve existing failed business models, to suppress new business models and technologies, and to obtain, if possible, enormous windfall profits from activity that not only causes no harm, but which is beneficial to copyright owners. Like Humpty-Dumpty, the copyright law we used to know can never be put back together again: multilateral and trade agreements have ensured that, and quite deliberately.
It’s depressing, and he’s probably right. Again: He says copyright’s “principal functions now are to preserve existing failed business models, to suppress new business models and technologies, and to obtain, if possible, enormous windfall profits from activity that not only causes no harm, but which is beneficial to copyright owners.”
What ever kind of thing could he be talking about? (Hat tip to Carol Ruth Shepard.)
Cross-posted in slightly expanded form on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®.
Posted in Blogophilia, Gelt, Lex scripta | 1 Comment »
Right on
Posted by Ron Coleman on July 27, 2008
RightPundits.com started in 2006, becoming the first in a string of multiple websites which span the entertainment and news world under the “Right” brand. Sister websites in the entertainment division include RightCelebrity.com, RightFielders.com, RightTelevision.com, RightCinema.com, RightBollywood.com, RightOnMusic.com, RightPictures.com, and RightFashions.com, the latter two websites currently in development. In the news division, RightPundits.com was joined recently by RightJuris.com which launched in June 2008. Future websites will include topics on history, science, and the arts.
Right-o!
Posted in Blogophilia | 4 Comments »
The bloggers, the Associated Press and the Media Bloggers Association
Posted by Ron Coleman on June 18, 2008
You can’t have missed the story (indeed an earlier version of this post was on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®), in all its agony — its schlepped-out, melodramatic agony. I link to Glenn Reynolds because he’s a good aggregator here, but also because it’s interesting to see how he’s gotten caught up in this, too.
One weensy problem with the blogosphere: It’s so quick, so supple, so instantaneous, so plastic… that it is also reactive, and in its own way, reactionary. Its reactions have the tendency, from time to time, of pouring flames on fires, and painting parties and their antagonists into corners neither wants to be in. That’s what has happened to some extent with the Drudge Retort story.
In contrast, Bob Cox of the Media Bloggers Association (MBA) demonstrates what a grownup blogger attitude could look like.
Yes, I am involved in these discussions, as general counsel of the Media Bloggers Association, and am not wholly objective. But I do believe that the overheated nature of the j’accuse crowd speaks for itself.
UPDATE: Oh my gosh! Really, the comments in that discussion run mostly along two lines: “Don’t confuse me with the facts,” and “I don’t know anyone who voted for Nixon!” At one point — several actually — Rogers Cadenhead himself actually checks in to clear the air. He’s the Drudge Retort guy himself who got the DMCA takedown notices, and all the outraged “experts” tell him, “Shut up, what the hell do you know?”
Posted in Blogophilia, Medialites, Oppression, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
Facebook good
Posted by Ron Coleman on June 15, 2008
I’ve come out in favor of Facebook, ultimately. In terms of professional networking and business development, it seems almost certainly to be well-nigh useless. I am also a little surprised at just how few people I went to school with here, there or anywhere are on the thing. I’m not that old! But I think it’s a great way to actually get to know other bloggers a little bit better. In particular I am fascinated at how the rightosphere has kind of coalesced into a number of interlinked groups of “friends” on the program. Of course those few tunnels across to the “other side” are interesting, too, but mostly they’re symbolic of good will and little more.
I also think it’s notable to see who is too snotty to respond to a “friend request” from within what one would expect to be the same community. And, again, who you might think would be, but is not. (It was also interesting to see one particular blogger’s momentary spurt of blogger-to-blogger matchmaking on Facebook, at once heartwarming and yet a little odd in the execution.)
On the whole, though, this is a really good thing: bloggers expanding the substantive space in which they social-network and developing human-like online relationships. It could really add up to something even better, I think. I’m not sure what. I’m not a visionary — I mean I have to spend almost $500 on glasses just to see across the street. Still yes, I think this is a good, good thing — but:
The key to enjoying Facebook, for adults, is this: Don’t add pretty much any idiotic “apps” if you are over 30. Delete, without apology, most of the ones you foolishly already added. You mostly need to be able to write on other folks’ walls, find more friends and friends of friends, plug your RSS feed into your profile, upload media files without going nuts self-obsession-wise — mostly utilizing the native features of Facebook, in other words. But most of the open-source applications either don’t work, take over your space, are really, really debasing or are just plain, uh, stupid.
And make sure your friends know it’s nothing personal when your ignore their “app”-generated “request.” It’s not that you wouldn’t want to be hugged, or have a pie thrown in your face, or be ranked by pulchritude, or to join the Free Egg McMuffin “cause” if the request that you do so involved only them. It’s just that from anyone else (and if you don’t use Facebook, the point is you have to actually add the application to “play” at all, and then it takes over your life) that “app” is probably going to be really, really annoying. Like the kind of annoying that gives a headache. Headache bad.
Posted in Blogophilia, Nuvo-Techno | 2 Comments »
Pass the mayo
Posted by Ron Coleman on June 6, 2008
I spent an inordinate amount of time last night writing a post about mayonnaise on LIKELIHOOD OF
CONFUSION®. I am gratified that it’s getting quite a bit of very unexpected play!
If you’re among the somewhat more select audience that reads this blog, though, you shouldn’t miss the post. Because, as you’ll see, it… it means quite a lot to me.
Posted in Blogophilia, Heart and spirit, Jocularity | Leave a Comment »
A new way we’re all racists
Posted by Ron Coleman on June 1, 2008
Black bloggers “fight to make [their] voices heard,” says the SF Chronicle (via Glenn, again):
With its power-to-the-individual approach, the new media world promises anyone with a laptop the possibility of a publishing empire. But, as some black bloggers are finding out, the new media world is a lot like the old one: racially segregated, with many prominent black voices still fighting to be heard.
“The progressive [sic] blogosphere is segregated,” said McCauley, whose What About Our Daughters blog was accepted to the DNC’s blogger pool. Essence magazine named McCauley one of its 25 most influential people last year alongside Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and filmmaker Tyler Perry. “Black bloggers link to other black bloggers, and progressive [sic] white bloggers link to other white progressive [sic] bloggers,” she said.
How progressive! It makes you want to spit. “Progressive.” Puh-lease.
For the rest of us, though, and this “fight” to “be heard”: Is there a widget that flags which blogs are written by black people and which ones are written by white people? Does it work in WordPress? Can I view it on Firefox? Is that why everyone knows I’m a sheeny? Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Blogophilia, Homo sapiens, Medialites, Oppression | 2 Comments »
Cheesecake from space
Posted by Ron Coleman on May 31, 2008
Posted in Blogophilia | Leave a Comment »
Not that there’s anything wrong with that
Posted by Ron Coleman on May 12, 2008
Not that I’m one to talk, either, but I hadn’t realized that Jonathan Alter was the inspiration for the George Costanza character on Seinfeld!
And Mickey Kaus… um, Kramer?
Posted in Blogophilia, Jocularity, Medialites | Leave a Comment »











