Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Homo sapiens’ Category

“Anti-gay”: Rights, wrongs and everything in between

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 23, 2008

Instapundit:

THOUGHTS ON gay rights and the G.O.P.’s future: “It’s not that we’re likely to crack more than 35% of the gay vote (well, maybe 40%). But, to win back the suburbs, Republicans can’t alienate suburbanites. And anti-gay attitudes don’t resonate with families who have known gay people in college –and maybe even in the workplace–and even in their own families.” Sounds right to me.

Yeah sounds right, unless you think about it.. even a little.  Then it sounds absolutely chilling, even if Gay Patriot himself doesn’t put chillingly.

Guess what:  Notwithstanding the antique Jerry Falwell image of cultural conservatives painted in the media — including the libertarian blogosphere — the vast majority of cultural conservatives are not “anti-gay” any more than they’re “anti-black.”  We know homosexuals … gays, yes… and blacks.  We’re friends with gays and blacks.  And regarding gays In the 21st century, few but the most hopeless paleoconservatives, fundamentalists of mainly non-Judeo-Christian stripes, and, well, weirdos have any interest in busting into bedrooms and getting any bit involved in what goes on behind closed doors.

But this is not the issue.  Conservatives are labeled “anti-gay” because people don’t know that some of our best friends — really — are gay.  And here Glenn Reynolds is not writing like a law professor, but like, well, a libertarian blogger.  But, in fact:

Regarding civil rights of blacks, it was not enough to say that they could be “tolerated” for being black.  It was and is a moral imperative to ensure that blacks received every legal right and benefit under the law that any other American received.  Beyond that, we can agree to disagree as to specific policies and goals to address America’s legacy of racism, but on fundamentals, in our time there is no disagreement.

It’s different for gays.  Yes, it is.  Gays are not asking for the same rights as everyone else, no matter how much they jump up and down and threaten to hold their breath till they turn blue.  It is not mere semantics to say “we want the same right to marry whom we love as straights have”; it is a fundamentally different, new, radical, revolutionary right that they want — the right to change the word very concept of marriage to include “marrying whomever they love,” whereas until just right now it has meant, semantically and legally, the right to join in matrimony with a person of the opposite sex.

This is not an argument about whether they should be entitled to that right.  If Instapundit and the rest of the decidedly irreligious rightosphere believes that gays should be entitled to a new right — the right to same-sex marriage — let them say so, as many do.  But conservatives are entitled to insist that this right be acknowledged, debated and addressed as new, radical and different, not — as its advocates insist in utter disregard of intellectual honesty — the axiomatically, morally-mandated extension of basic civil rights to gays comparable to ending the ban on miscegenation.  It is not that. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Homo sapiens, Medialites, O Mores! | 21 Comments »

Let the man lash out

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 23, 2008

Naturally he’s upset:  His son just killed himself on the Internet:

The father of a college student whose suicide was broadcast live over a webcam said Saturday he was appalled by the virtual audience that egged on his son and called for tougher regulation of Internet sites.

“Tougher regulation of Internet sites”?   That’s like arguing that because people shout out to jumpers, “JUMP!,” we should have tougher regulation of city blocks.

Don’t confuse the medium with the human condition.  But let’s give the man his space, too.  It’s a sad thing.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

The darkness falls

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 3, 2008

Dim days

Dim days

No, nothing to do with politics.  Rather, the end of Daylight Savings Time.

I’ve mentioned before that I usually get melancholy when the days get shorter.  So here I am Sunday, driving back to New Jersey from the Norwalk Aquarium with the crew, yes, in the minivan, and it’s black out at 6 PM, and I start thinking morbid thoughts, really getting lower and lower, getting a catch in my throat about lost youth and — and —

All of a sudden I realize, it’s the first day of Standard Time!  The very first day experiencing the reality of photodeprivation and I’m already down in the mouth!

This realization, this moment of self-awareness, actually was helpful, because it enabled me to appreciate that I was merely responding to a stimulus (or perhaps the withdrawal of a stimulus?) and that there was no reason to be any more appalled about existence, vel non, than there was on the previously sunny day at that same exact time on the clock.

This does raise the somewhat troubling question, though, of just how sensitive we are to subtle and not-so-subtle changes to our environments, and how that affects not only our moods but our decision-making, our relationships with others, and everything else that ripples across the pool.  We go about as if we were masters of our own destiny when in all probability most of us are merely more or less aware of how our environments manipulate our inner magnets, but all are affected by them profoundly.

Posted in Heart and spirit, Homo sapiens | 1 Comment »

With privileges like that…

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 12, 2008

Instapundit:

NO POLITICAL ANGLE HERE: Newsweek: Working Moms Bad for Kids. “A new study finds that children of privileged families fare worse when the mother works outside the home.”

Fair enough questioning the timing, Glenn.  But probably not much to question about the conclusion.  It’s hard making it on one income these days, but it’s probably harder on kids to be “privileged” in terms of household income but having to “do without” their own mom most of the day.

Posted in Americana, Gelt, Homo sapiens, Suburbia | 2 Comments »

The City

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 11, 2008

Manhattan has been compelled to expand skyward because of the absence of any other direction in which to grow. This, more than any other thing, is responsible for its physical majesty. It is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village–the visible symbol of aspiration and faith, the white plume saying that the way is up. The summer traveler swings in … and as [his car] glides above the pigeon lofts and back yards of Queens looks southwest to where the morning light first strikes the steel peaks of midtown, and he sees its upward thrust unmistakable: the great wall of sand towers rising, the smoke rising, the heat not yet rising, the hopes and ferments of so many awakening millions rising–this vigorous spear that presses heaven hard….

The subtlest change in New York is something people don’t speak much about but that is in everyone’s mind. The city, for the first time in its long history, is destructible. A single flight of planes no bigger that a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal chambers, cremate the millions. The intimidation of mortality is part of New York now: in the sound of jets overhead, in the black headlines of the latest edition. All dwellers in cities must live with the stubborn fact of annihilation; in New York the fact is somewhat more concentrated because of the concentration of the city itself, and because, of all targets, New York has a certain clear priority. In the mind of whatever perverted dreamer who might loose the lightning, New York must hold a steady, irresistible charm.

It used to be that the Statue of Liberty was the signpost that proclaimed New York and translated it for all the world. Today Liberty shares the role with Death. Along the East River, from the razed laughterhouses of Turtle Bay, as though in a race with the spectral flight of planes, men are carving out the permanent headquarters of the United Nations–the greatest housing project of them all. In its stride, New York takes on one more interior city, to shelter, this time, all governments, and to clear the slum called war. New York is not a capital city–it is not a national capital or a stage capital. But it is by way of becoming the capital of the world. The buildings, as conceived by architects, will be cigar boxes set on end. Traffic will flow in a new tunnel under First Avenue. Forty-seventh Street will be widened (and if my guess is any good, trucks will appear late at night to plant tall trees surreptitiously, their roots to mingle with the intestines of the town). Once again the city will absorb, almost without showing any sign of it, a congress of visitors. . . .

The city at last perfectly illustrates both the universal dilemma and the general solution, this riddle in steel and stone is at once the perfect target and the perfect demonstration of nonviolence, of racial brotherhood, this lofty target scraping the skies and meeting the destroying planes halfway, home of all people and all nations, capital of everything, housing the deliberations by which the planes are to be stayed and their errand forestalled.

A block or two west of the new City of Man in Turtle Bay there is an old willow tree that presides over an interior garden. It is a battered tree, long-suffering and much-climbed, held together by strands of wire but beloved of those who know it. In a way it symbolizes the city: life under difficulties, growth against odds, sap-rise in the midst of concrete, and the steady reaching for the sun. Whenever I look at it nowadays, and feel the cold shadow of the planes, I thing: “This must be saved, this particular thing, this very tree.” If it were to go, all would go–the city, this mischievous and marvelous monument which not to look upon would be like death.

E. B. White, Here is New York (1949) .

Posted in Americana, Heart and spirit, Homo sapiens, Metropolis, Past is prologue, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

Timothy Noah, master of self parody

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 6, 2008

I kept checking to make sure this wasn’t just something I missed on April 1st, but no:

When white people are invited to think about Obama’s physical appearance, the principal

Boy, could this guy pass!

Boy, could this guy pass!

attribute they’re likely to dwell on is his dark skin. Consequently, any reference to Obama’s other physical attributes can’t help coming off as a coy walk around the barn. A whole genre of humor turns on this reality. A Slate colleague informs me that an episode of the TV sitcom Happy Days (“Fonzie’s New Friend”) had its 1950s-era characters nervously discussing the fact that a black man in their midst was so … skinny. Was it true that skinny people liked fried chicken? That they were good at basketball? And so on.

No, really. Seriously.

So we, who thought we could take some solace regarding our melanin deficiencies in our endowments of underlying flesh, turn out to be no-good racists again on that score too.

I feel like a bit, fat idiot.

UPDATE:  Racist idiot, that is.  (Via Glenn.) (Bumped.)

Posted in Homo sapiens, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus, Style | 4 Comments »

The human of mouth

Posted by Ron Coleman on July 21, 2008

Dean Esmay:

[A]fter 8 years of watching every minor verbal stumble of George W. Bush be portrayed as proof of his being a drooling semi-sentient moron, I have very little sympathy for the people who are upset when people do the same thing to Obama. Welcome to the big leagues kids, where what you throw at others is likely to be thrown right back at you.

And Obama’s good — really good, unlike GWB, who’s really bad. But human, we are all, even the Chosen One.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Medialites, Politics and Poker | 4 Comments »

Get some sleep. For my sake!

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 23, 2008

No surprise here:  “Sleep deprivation disconnects the emotional brain”:

Disturbed sleep patterns feature in a range of psychiatric disorders, many of which fall under the DSM’s mood disorder category. A recent paper by Yoo et al (2007) suggests that sleep deprivation itself can produce abnormal affective processing. In other words, sleep disturbances may be a cause as well as a symptom in conditions such as depression.

Thank Yoo very much, but anyone who’s lived in the world much knows this, right?

Good night.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Scientificus | Leave a Comment »

Freeman Hunt: People Are Not Pets

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 6, 2008

Is it immoral to give people the opportunity to exit the stone age?

Posted in Homo sapiens, O Mores!, Oppression | Leave a Comment »

A new way we’re all racists

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 1, 2008

Black bloggers “fight to make [their] voices heard,” says the SF Chronicle (via Glenn, again):

With its power-to-the-individual approach, the new media world promises anyone with a laptop the possibility of a publishing empire. But, as some black bloggers are finding out, the new media world is a lot like the old one: racially segregated, with many prominent black voices still fighting to be heard.

“The progressive [sic] blogosphere is segregated,” said McCauley, whose What About Our Daughters blog was accepted to the DNC’s blogger pool. Essence magazine named McCauley one of its 25 most influential people last year alongside Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and filmmaker Tyler Perry. “Black bloggers link to other black bloggers, and progressive [sic] white bloggers link to other white progressive [sic] bloggers,” she said.

How progressive! It makes you want to spit. “Progressive.” Puh-lease.

For the rest of us, though, and this “fight” to “be heard”: Is there a widget that flags which blogs are written by black people and which ones are written by white people? Does it work in WordPress? Can I view it on Firefox? Is that why everyone knows I’m a sheeny? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Blogophilia, Homo sapiens, Medialites, Oppression | 2 Comments »