Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Oppression’ Category

A new way we’re all racists

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 1, 2008

Black bloggers “fight to make [their] voices heard,” says the SF Chronicle (via Glenn, again):

With its power-to-the-individual approach, the new media world promises anyone with a laptop the possibility of a publishing empire. But, as some black bloggers are finding out, the new media world is a lot like the old one: racially segregated, with many prominent black voices still fighting to be heard.

“The progressive [sic] blogosphere is segregated,” said McCauley, whose What About Our Daughters blog was accepted to the DNC’s blogger pool. Essence magazine named McCauley one of its 25 most influential people last year alongside Illinois Sen. Barack Obama and filmmaker Tyler Perry. “Black bloggers link to other black bloggers, and progressive [sic] white bloggers link to other white progressive [sic] bloggers,” she said.

How progressive! It makes you want to spit. “Progressive.” Puh-lease.

For the rest of us, though, and this “fight” to “be heard”: Is there a widget that flags which blogs are written by black people and which ones are written by white people? Does it work in WordPress? Can I view it on Firefox? Is that why everyone knows I’m a sheeny? Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Blogophilia, Homo sapiens, Medialites, Oppression | 2 Comments »

Too little, too late

Posted by Ron Coleman on May 29, 2008

An Anglican bishop laments the collapse of the English church:

The collapse of Christianity has wrecked British society, a leading Church of England bishop declared yesterday.

It has destroyed family life and left the country defenceless against the rise of radical Islam in a moral and spiritual vacuum.

In a lacerating attack on liberal values, the Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali, the Bishop of Rochester, said the country was mired in a doctrine of ‘endless self-indulgence’ that had brought an explosion in public violence and binge-drinking.

In a blow to Gordon Brown, he mocked the ‘scramblings and scratchings’ of politicians who try to cast new British values such as respect and tolerance.

The Pakistani-born bishop dated the downfall of Christianity from the ‘social and sexual revolution’ of the 1960s.

(Via Glenn.)  Good luck with that one.  The fact is, the empty churches of Britain are a culmination of over a century of failure by the Anglican Church to find a way to keep the English in the pews.  Founded on reasons of state and lust by Henry VIII, the Church of England ripped the Catholic soul out of British Christianity and mainly flourished to the extent it did at all in the succeeding centuries as a flavoring for confident Jingoism.

With the collapse of the Empire, the COE’s main activity has been keeping up with the Joneses in terms of out-Vatican-II’ing Vatican II in a race to the left.  It has lacked either the reactionary equilibration or the charisma — much less the interest and courage on behalf of freedom — of a John Paul II.  And it has, in an effort to please leftist elites, tied the United Nations in the contest for foremost legitimatizer of antisemitism in the West.

Can Right Reverend Michael Nazir-Ali turn the ship of spirituality in England around?  Almost certainly not.  But if he really wants to try, let him catch up with Vatican II in one way the COE has completely punted:  By publicly condemning the entrenched antisemitism, couched cynically as anti-Zionism, of the Anglican Church and English society in general.  The Jews or their treatment may not matter so much in England’s big picture, but it is a simple fact that you can weigh the moral merit of any society, and any institution, in no small measure by how it deals with the social and cultural cancer of antisemitism.  In the case of the COE, it has historically, and in contemporary times, done a despicable job.  There’s no better way to show the world of what he is made, and to demonstrate that there just may just be a good reason to root for Anglican Christianity to survive, than for the Right Reverend Nazir-Ali to address that challenge head on.

Posted in Euroids, Faith and Works, Oppression | 6 Comments »

No more pretenders

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 30, 2008

Associated Press:

DNA tests carried out by a U.S. laboratory prove that bone fragments exhumed last year belong to two children of Czar Nicholas II, putting to rest questions about what happened to Russia’s last royal family, a regional governor said Wednesday.

Bone fragments dug up near the Ural Mountains city of Yekaterinburg are indeed those of Crown Prince Alexei and his sister, Maria, whose remains had been missing since the family was murdered in 1918 as Russia descended into civil war, said Eduard Rossel, governor of the Sverdlovsk region.

An amazing thing, to resolve a great historical question this way. The Romanov Dynasty was wicked and cruel as a whole, but there was no moral basis — other than Leninist “revolutionary justice” — to kill the children of tsar. They were killed, and brutally too, and now any lingering questions would seem to be resolved.

Posted in Oppression, Past is prologue, Scientificus | 1 Comment »

Roosting season

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 28, 2008

DANA MILBANK:

Speaking before an audience that included Marion Barry, Cornel West, Malik Zulu Shabazz of the New Black Panther Party and Nation of Islam official Jamil Muhammad, Wright praised Louis Farrakhan, defended the view that Zionism is racism, accused the United States of terrorism, repeated his view that the government created the AIDS virus to cause the genocide of racial minorities, stood by other past remarks (“God damn America”) and held himself out as a spokesman for the black church in America.

(Via Insty.)  You’re still all missing the point.  Yesterday Rev. Wright received a standing ovation for essentially the same speech.  Not from some fringe group, but from the NAACP.

This is mainstream thinking among the black elite in this country, it seems, and certainly in the black churches — and Obama Barack, at best, believes he can at best inch away from it in order to corral votes from the rest of us.

And I told you this months ago, before the story was Rev. Wright himself.

And only now are those chickens, if you will, coming home to roost.

Posted in Americana, Faith and Works, Oppression, Politics and Poker | 19 Comments »

Votes don’t grow on trees

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 28, 2008

Instapundit:

SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS Indiana’s voter ID law: “The Supreme Court has ruled that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights.” Seems reasonable to me.

Amazingly, it didn’t to three justices.

Why do I have a feeling — without the decision being available yet — I can guess who they [Souter-Stevens-Ginsberg-Breyer] are?

UPDATE: Stevens actually wrote the majority opinion, interestingly.  Jack Balkin writes:

In Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, the Supreme Court continues a trend of using technical doctrines of facial challenges to swat away constitutional litigation and drive questions back to the political process. Whether you think that is a good or a bad thing depends on your view of whether the Indiana legislature was essentially limiting access to the ballot to certain classes of voters in order to help the Republican Party stay in power. If you think that the political process will take care of enfranchising these voters, you need not worry too much about the result. If, on the other hand, you think that the political process is being used to build in advantages for one party over another, there is greater reason to be concerned.

That’s his first paragraph, his topic paragraph. He uses the word “constitutional” once, and never in a substantive way. In other words, Balkin does not like the policy of the U.S. Supreme Court. But he doesn’t seem to have much of a constitutional or legal argument — spot the word “technical”? — to make.

Posted in Lex scripta, Oppression | 2 Comments »

No other way?

Posted by pennywit on April 2, 2008

After what amounts to a multiyear campaign of harassment, an Arkansas boy named Billy Wolfe and his parents have filed lawsuits against schoolyard bullies, according to coverage in the New York Times, the Northwest Arkansas Times, and elsewhere. The kid even appeared on the Today Show to tell his story.

Honestly, the whole storyline — “Bully sues his tormentors!!” sounds like something out of Weekly World News, somewhere behind the pages about alien Elvis impersonators running for president. But it’s not. It’s as real as the various little monsters who over the past decade-plus have taken up arms and slaughtered their classmates for slights real and imagined.

And when I try to think about what the kid is supposed to do about the bullies, that’s exactly what I think of. The school shootings. A lawsuit against the bullies (and possibly against the school administration) seems to outlandish and disproportionate that I’ve spent the better part of a week trying to figure out what Billy and his parents are supposed to do about the bullying.

But I can’t come up with anything better than the lawsuit. They’ve exhausted their legal self-help remedies. Billy’s parents talked to the bully’s parents, to no avail. Billy turned to school administrators, but he found no succor. In fact, he was blamed — and the bullies escaped punishment — in at least one of the incidents! With these remedies denied him, what’s left? Self-defense? Perhaps, though I’m not certain if he’s tried (and failed) that remedy.

Hitting back — the traditional, parent-endorsed response to such things — is right out. That sort of thing is illegal. Assault and battery. Responding to the harassment campaign — which included a Facebook page dedicated to hating Billy — may or may not be effective. And, again, it’s probably illegal.

If a friend of mine finds himself the target of a long, multiyear campaign of harassment and he’s had no luck getting it stopped on his own, I would likely tell him he should turn to the court system. Injunctions, restraining orders, and defamation lawsuits can be highly useful things. And Billy has taken the same route.

And then there’s the school shootings. When some of these bullied kids have had enough, some have turned on their tormentors with violent results. Which would be bad enough. But those kids — Dylan Klebold and Eric Harris among them — lash out not just at their tormentors, but at nearly anybody who gets in their way. Despite the outward ridiculousness of Billy’s lawsuit, perhaps his choice is the better alternative.

UPDATE:  Hmm.  (RDC)

Posted in Lex scripta, Oppression | 1 Comment »

The global test

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 31, 2008

Instapundit:

I EAGERLY AWAIT THE HOLLYWOOD BLOCKBUSTER BASED ON THIS REPORT: EU Soldiers Accused of Torturing Civilians in Congo.

Gosh, and to think that because of the Bush Administration, the reputation of the U.S. has been lowered in all those previously dewy eyes around the world!

It’s just better off for everyone to keep expectations real low, I guess.

Posted in Euroids, Oppression | Leave a Comment »

What Wright did wrong

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 30, 2008

Shannon Love:

Obama’s close association with Rev. Wright may have destroyed his political ambitions by undermining the perception that he is a new kind of African-American politician, who does not see white Americans as evil. It called into question the sincerity of his views about the majority of Americans and American institutions. How can he represent, protect and lead the white Americans that his long-time minister, confidant and mentor sees as evil people?Leftist African-Americans like Rev. Wright take it as axiomatic that they cannot trust white Americans due to their evil and corrupt nature. Yet they seem puzzled and angered that white Americans do not trust them in return.

Trust is a two-way street. To be trusted, one must give trust. Let us hope that one day, those on the Left learn that lesson.

I have often argued that it is a grave mistake, and one commonly made by conservatives who do not think deeply enough into the matter, to insist that white-black dialogue, sensibilities and even policies be mirror images of each other. This is urged only as the appropriate policymaking premise for “color-blindness,” but the appropriate standard for interpersonal relations. Thus certain whites pretend to be offended when black comedians imitate whites, or fume over black expressions of themselves as people who, surprise, insist that they experience a different cultural experience as Americans from that of typical whites.

This is simply a lack of sensitivity disguised as fairness. It is different when you are the majority. You can be teased. You can be the butt of jokes. It is not really offensive to be made fun of for being white, and the people pretending offense know this. This is a simplistic conception of how to react to the overplaying of the victimization card, and those who insist on it are not advancing either the discussion or the solution in any sense.

There is also a flip side to this argument, which is what Shannon is pointing out here. If blacks as a group, at this stage of the game, expect their group identity, their legitimate shared experiences and perceptions, and their interests to be taken seriously, they have got to stop playing the game she has described. Not because I say so, or she does, or a judge will, but because the majority will not have it. The concept that people are wicked for being who they are is not only ironic when applied by blacks, once considered by some satanic themselves simply because of their negritude. It is not only morally and logically unsupportable. It is a loser of an argument. Liberalism is premised largely on guilt; but that much guilt is not being distributed through the water supply.

There will be no political maturity, no Promised Land, until black leaders accept, teach and preach that Pharaoh and his minions are dead on the shore of the Red Sea, and that we are all here, on the other side, together.

Cross-posted on Right Wing News.

Posted in Americana, Homo sapiens, Oppression | 9 Comments »

Cuba’s door opens a crack

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 28, 2008

AP:

President Raul Castro’s government said Friday it is allowing cell phones for ordinary Cubans, a luxury previously reserved for those who worked for foreign firms or held key posts with the communist-run state.It was the first official announcement of the lifting of a major restriction under the 76-year-old Castro, and marked the kind of small freedom many on the island have been hoping he would embrace since succeeding his older brother Fidel as president last month.

That is a much bigger deal than it sounds like.  Isn’t it?

Posted in Oppression | 1 Comment »

Key McCain endorsement, but not from Hot Air

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 26, 2008

Ed Morrissey (blogging at Hot Air?! what did I miss?) writes about Hugo Chavez’s “Anyone but McCain” declaration (via Insty).

The obvious observation, of course–so obvious I wasn’t going to make it, because it is almost trite–is that this is as strong an endorsement of McCain that anyone interested in freedom or democracy could hope for. This should include conservatives. Axiomatically. And indeed, this point is made by HotAir commenters.

What is extraordinary is that Ed, a great blogger, can barely bring himself around to make this point, and hedges so apologetically that it’s hardly worth the effort.

I don’t think it’s Ed, though. I think it’s Hot Air, the red-meat, no-things-in-moderation blog.

Which side, exactly, is Michelle Malkin on?

Posted in Blogophilia, Oppression, Politics and Poker | 4 Comments »