Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Scientificus’ Category

Brain melt via cell

Posted by Ron Coleman on July 24, 2008

ABC News reports that a leading cancer researcher has informally let it be known that, definitive scientific results notwithstanding, he thinks gluing a cell phone to the side of your head probably does fry your brain:

“Really at the heart of my concern is that we shouldn’t wait for a definitive study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather than sorry later,” Herberman said.

No other major academic cancer research institutions have sounded such an alarm about cell phone use. But Herberman’s advice is sure to raise concern among many cell phone users and especially parents.

In the memo he sent to about 3,000 faculty and staff Wednesday, he says children should use cell phones only for emergencies because their brains are still developing.

Adults should keep the phone away from the head and use the speakerphone or a wireless headset, he says. He even warns against using cell phones in public places like a bus because it exposes others to the phone’s electromagnetic fields.

I’d keep that little Bluetooth thingy out of your ear, too. Why on earth actually inject electromagnetic waves into your head? Waves, or beams, or particles, or phlogiston. Whatever.

I tend to be really skeptical about sky-is-falling public health panics. This one I buy, intuitively, based on my utter lack of understanding of a single scientific, medical or technical issue involved. And, as an American and a blogger, I am committed to standing on that platform of ignorance and shouting terror and fear to the rooftops. Laugh if you will, but keep that damned thing away from my noggin.

Posted in Nuvo-Techno, Scientificus | 4 Comments »

Get some sleep. For my sake!

Posted by Ron Coleman on June 23, 2008

No surprise here:  “Sleep deprivation disconnects the emotional brain”:

Disturbed sleep patterns feature in a range of psychiatric disorders, many of which fall under the DSM’s mood disorder category. A recent paper by Yoo et al (2007) suggests that sleep deprivation itself can produce abnormal affective processing. In other words, sleep disturbances may be a cause as well as a symptom in conditions such as depression.

Thank Yoo very much, but anyone who’s lived in the world much knows this, right?

Good night.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Scientificus | Leave a Comment »

No more pretenders

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 30, 2008

Associated Press:

DNA tests carried out by a U.S. laboratory prove that bone fragments exhumed last year belong to two children of Czar Nicholas II, putting to rest questions about what happened to Russia’s last royal family, a regional governor said Wednesday.

Bone fragments dug up near the Ural Mountains city of Yekaterinburg are indeed those of Crown Prince Alexei and his sister, Maria, whose remains had been missing since the family was murdered in 1918 as Russia descended into civil war, said Eduard Rossel, governor of the Sverdlovsk region.

An amazing thing, to resolve a great historical question this way. The Romanov Dynasty was wicked and cruel as a whole, but there was no moral basis — other than Leninist “revolutionary justice” — to kill the children of tsar. They were killed, and brutally too, and now any lingering questions would seem to be resolved.

Posted in Oppression, Past is prologue, Scientificus | 1 Comment »

“Tests Confirm T. Rex Kinship With Birds”

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 24, 2008

New York Times:

In the first analysis of proteins extracted from dinosaur bones, scientists say they have established more firmly than ever that the closest living relatives of the mighty predator Tyrannosaurus rex are modern birds.

Hoo boy. Here come the paternity suits!

Posted in Jocularity, Scientificus | 3 Comments »

The word and the thought

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 22, 2008

New York Times:

[Steven Pinker] cautions against confusing the “many ways in which language connects to thought.” “Language surely affects thought,” he writes, but he argues that there is little evidence for the claims that language can force people to have particular thoughts or make it impossible for them to think in certain ways.

That is actually something of a dissenting opinion, or seems to be, among researchers commenting on the linked article, in which experiments seemed to suggest a very different conclusion. But this is a fascinating topic, and one I was discussing with a very bright lawyer friend this weekend who, like me (actually, better than I) knows both English and Hebrew. I was telling him how, as my Hebrew skills improved, I was increasingly struck by the beauty and power of biblical passages. In particular I was thinking of the parts of the Torah that recount the Exodus, which of course was of recent interest.

Mezzanine latticework, 60 Centre Street

“Hebrew is powerful,” he agreed, “but it lacks the precision of English. And that,” he said, “is why Middle Eastern peoples kill each other so readily: Their imprecise language, and their thinking, result in black and white approaches to life that don’t leave much room for tolerance or doubt.”

Maybe. But a lot of things in a culture can provide nurture violence. And as this Times article says, while there can be no mistake about the connection between language and conceptual development, it is probably a mistake to overestimate the effect of language on a people.

And after all, Hebrew itself is the language that, along with its cognate Aramaic, gave birth to the analytical depth and infinite shades of grey realized in the Talmud — a level of analysis, it is true, that is required in order to flesh out the flat-footed, “plain” meaning of arguably very vague, imprecise biblical texts. It is this process that is the premise of traditional rabbinic Judaism.

But focusing either on language or other social constructs also throws a sort of amoral mechanist blanket over moral teaching, at the societal level, and moral decision-making, at the individual letter, that is begets warranty. Ultimately people are, and should be treated as, moral decision-makers. Even if they are affected and shaped by their cultures, souls know the truth, no matter how much we foul up the ability of members of a society to make the inquiry and seek it.

Posted in Faith and Works, Homo sapiens, Scientificus | 3 Comments »

Where the boys are

Posted by Ron Coleman on April 10, 2008

Can game theory explain why there aren’t any good single guys out there?

Posted in Homo sapiens, Scientificus, Stragety | Leave a Comment »

Oh, the vanity!

Posted by pennywit on April 5, 2008

Vanity Fair investigates Monsanto’s efforts to enforce its patents on seeds against farmers. I can’t speak to the validity of Monsanto’s claims one way or another, but the company’s tactics strike me as heavy-handed.

Posted in Lex scripta, Scientificus | Leave a Comment »

Does there have to be a why?

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 13, 2008

In the New York Times:

The $1.6 million Templeton Prize, the richest award made to an individual by a philanthropic organization, was given Wednesday to Michael Heller, 72, a Roman Catholic priest, cosmologist and philosopher who has spent his life asking, and perhaps more impressively answering, questions like “Does the universe need to have a cause?”

The $1.6 million Templeton Prize, the richest award made to an individual by a philanthropic organization, was given Wednesday to Michael Heller, 72, a Roman Catholic priest, cosmologist and philosopher who has spent his life asking, and perhaps more impressively answering, questions like “Does the universe need to have a cause?”

The John Templeton Foundation, which awards grants to encourage scientific discovery on the “big questions” in science and philosophy, commended Professor Heller, who is from Poland, for his extensive writings that have “evoked new and important consideration of some of humankind’s most profound concepts.”

Much of Professor Heller’s career has been dedicated to reconciling the known scientific world with the unknowable dimensions of God.

In doing so, he has argued against a “God of the gaps” strategy for relating science and religion, a view that uses God to explain what science cannot.

Professor Heller said he believed, for example, that the religious objection to teaching evolution “is one of the greatest misunderstandings” because it “introduces a contradiction or opposition between God and chance.”Peaceable Kingdom - Edward Hicks

So much energy is spent by people on both sides of this purported divide, uselessly assailing the other side. The only basis for such an assault is when one claims it can meaningfully explain the other. More:

In a telephone interview, Professor Heller explained his affinity for the two fields: “I always wanted to do the most important things, and what can be more important than science and religion? Science gives us knowledge, and religion gives us meaning. Both are prerequisites of the decent existence.”

I am sure that will rile up some people in the neighborhood who believe their existence is quite decent without any consideration of God in their lives. But I came to the same conclusion, myself, as a young adult. Not that religion guarantees a decent life, but that there is certainly little hope for it without some form of relationship with God.

Posted in Faith and Works, Scientificus | 1 Comment »

Hopeless!

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 26, 2008

Jonathan Rogers links to a story that pretty much puts the lie to diet soda.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Scientificus | Leave a Comment »

Diagnosis

Posted by Ron Coleman on February 24, 2008

Lisa Sanders in the New York Times:

“[T]he very hardest kind of diagnosis — an unusual presentation of an unusual disease.”

This is a fascinating article about the workings of great medical minds and technology in our time.

Posted in Homo sapiens, Nuvo-Techno, Scientificus | Leave a Comment »