“Blogger” Cory Doctorow utilizes scare quotes — “scientists” and “predict” — to mock a proposed anti-terrorism strategy:
Computer and behavioral scientists at the University at Buffalo are developing automated systems that track faces, voices, bodies and other biometrics against scientifically tested behavioral indicators to provide a numerical score of the likelihood that an individual may be about to commit a terrorist act. “The goal is to identify the perpetrator in a security setting before he or she has the chance to carry out the attack,” said Venu Govindaraju, Ph.D., professor of computer science and engineering in the UB School of Engineering and Applied Sciences. Govindaraju is co-principal investigator on the project with Mark G. Frank, Ph.D., associate professor of communication in the UB College of Arts and Sciences.
Doctorow “links” to this story, which treats the project very seriously, but he obviously “thinks” it’s a joke, comparing it to the discredited discipline of phrenology. He doesn’t explain why it’s like phrenology, but expects us to “get it” that because they are both based on the observation of physical characteristics which supposedly lead to a prediction of behavior, both must be equally lacking in validity.
This is called a “faulty analogy” or “sloppy journalism,” because, in fact, the story linked to suggests that this nascent science may in fact be very promising. Certainly no one is suggesting that anyone could be arrested or convicted on the basis of the observations, technology and algorithms that would be employed, but considering the cost of letting a person who is just a little better at hiding his intentions than Richard Ried get on a plane and hijack it to 70 Virgins Interplanetary Airport, it sounds like a good idea to try this technology.
Cory Doctorow, however, thinks it is a joke, and offensive to his libertarian instincts; and no explanation is necessary to explain why.
Perhaps the next time some airplane falls out of the sky because Cory Doctorow or the ACLU object to “profiling” and projects such as this are shouted down, Doctorow will “find” someone else to “blame.”