Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Plus ça change

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 3, 2008

Rosemary Kondraciuk, once known as Rosemary Esmay, and who has moved a few things lately, has moved, redesigned and renamed her blog.

While she is still unquestionably the Queen of All Evil, her blog is now called The Change, and you can find it here.

Good luck, your majesty!

Posted in Blogophilia | Leave a Comment »

Chopping down the mast

Posted by Jack on September 1, 2008

Well McCain just chose Palin and as a father of two little girls, and as a husband of a black woman, I can tell ya straight out that this is really whipping up the women folk around me. I suspect it will whip up the women folk just about everywhere. As in real excited.

At lunch the girls and I watched her give her coming out speech and her performance was excellent. I still don’t know a whole lot about her, but what I have learned about her and her family is pretty impressive, given her age. She seems to share a lot of values in common with me personally, and she seems like a stand-up gal. She’s as good looking as the summer day is long too. She ain’t hard on the eyes, that’s for durn sure. And that’s my kinda gal too.

From her credentials I could accept her as President, she seems tough enough, strong enough, classy enough, and capable enough.

You know though this has been the single most interesting Presidential race I’ve seen since Reagan pounded Carter. (And I’ve been participating in politics for awhile, and this race is just fascinating to me.) In the past I’ve never really been a McCain man and truth be told I’ve always been kinda suspicious of him. I just didn’t really trust him, and part of me still doesn’t.

But I have to admit that the man has run the single best, and I mean single best Presidential Campaign I’ve ever seen. He and his strategists are just simply politically brilliant. They’ve hamstrung the Democrats at every step even during the period when the Dems should have been at the top of the mast. But McCain keeps chopping the mast down before the Dems ever get close to the crow’s nest. From a political point of view it is almost phenomenal the tactics employed. This campaign should be studied for years to come as a sort of lesson learned in the Judo politics: Take a strength and make the other guy use it against himself. If McCain and his team could govern the same way he campaigns, well hell, he’d be a modern marvel. I sure do like fellas who can turn not only the other guy’s weaknesses against him, but can exploit the seeming strengths of the other guy and make him eat those too. That’s exactly what we’ll need against the Ruskies and Al Qaeda. (Maybe the Chinese too. We’ll see.) But you don’t just hit a man where he ain’t, you hit a man where he is, and if you hit smart enough and long enough and hard enough then all his seemingly impressive armor is just a liability that weighs him down and won’t let him escape in time. If McCain is that kinda clever, and given this campaign and his early start on the Surge sorta proves that he might be, then I can’t say it would break my heart none, especially given the nature of our enemies.

Something about McCain still sorta eludes me, and I’m still sorta wary of him, but with picks like this and campaign tactics like he is employing, I’ve gotta admit out loud now, that I’m beginning to really admire the man, maybe even grow some affection for him.

Now we’ll see what Palin is like too. From what I’ve seen so far though, she sure seems to be the right man for the job. And I believe a lot of Repubs and Independents could ride into office on the coat-tails of McCain and Palin. An awful lot. As a matter of fact McCain and Palin could end up reshaping the Repubs in a way that no-one else could. It’s like “only Nixon could go to China.” Except in this case I suspect that both McCain and Palin are far better men than Nixon.

Posted in Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

Bad for the Jews

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 1, 2008

Instapundit:

JOHN MCCAIN: Bad for Israel?

Not quite.  Not unless you believe that the opposite — “good for Israel” means (1) being against the Iraq war and wishing Saddam Hussein were still around, because his loss as a counterweight has empowered Iran more than his removal has made the world, and the region a better place; and (2) the few policy decisions of the Bush Administration, which would presumable have been made and whose like would yet be made by a McCain Administration would not have happened under an Obama Administration.

Both of these propositions are highly debatable.  As to the first, it wasn’t that long ago that, when the Iraq War was widely “recognized” by smart opinion as a dumb, losing proposition, it was Israel’s fault that it happened in the first place — the “neocons” were handmaidens for the Zionists.  Now winning it was dumb, because it’s bad for Israel!  Not quite blame the Jews, but an interesting variation.

Regarding the second, Jeffrey Goldberg would have us believe that something like the following would never, ever happen if the Party of Carter were back in the saddle:

Recall that it was Bush who insisted, over then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s strong objections, that Hamas participate in elections in Gaza and the West Bank.  This was part of Bush’s brilliant neocon-inspired plan to democratize the region.  To state the obvious, that turned out badly for Israel too, and Hamas is now in control of Gaza and becoming a graver threat to Israel every day.

We’re supposed to believe that this dovish, idealistic policy would never come out of Barack Obama’s White House?

Israel today is in more peril than it was eight years ago.  In fact, it is in more peril than it has been since at least the Yom Kippur war of 1973, and perhaps even since its War of Independence.  So color me skeptical that Bush’s policies have been “good for Israel,” as the refrain in my community goes.  It is unfair, of course, to assume that Israel’s situation today is the result of Bush’s policies merely because they have coincided with his terms in office.  So let’s not assume; let’s look.

Like a good Zionist, Goldberg looks everywhere for Israel’s disastrous state but the most obvious place:  Israel.  The vast majority of its awful policy decisions, whether in terms of defense, international relations, tactics, economics and domestic policy, are not in any way decided or even on the radar on Pennsylvania Avenue.  They are the result of a string of breathtakingly incompetent governments purporting to run a depressingly corrupt kleptocracy to please an obsolescing and self-loathing elite that lacks the will to even purport to lead a confused and mainly unmotivated populace that obsesses on a slim minority of practitioners of its own religion in its midst as the bogeyman that explains its existential hopelessness.  A preposterously irrational and self-destructive foreign policy is almost besides the point and is hardly a surprise — but a secular Zionist can hardly be expected to wrestle with this honestly when there are Republicans to blame and election in the air.

Neither Barack Obama nor John McCain will do anything about that, nor can they.  But to suggest that there’s anything about Obama’s election that would be good for Israel is to believe that Jimmy Carter and Jim Baker really have Israel’s “best interests” in mind as they sell it down the river with “tough love.”  Don’t buy it.

Posted in Medialites, Past is prologue, Sisyphus, Stragety | 8 Comments »

Johnny, we hardly knew ye

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 1, 2008

John Hawkins, whose Right Wing News blog is, he says, one of the 15 largest conservative blogs, has been shut out of the GOP convention.  Why?

My best guess as to why I’m not being allowed to go to the RNC is a post I wrote back in March called, “Why I Will No Longer Support John McCain For President.” The piece savagely denounced McCain for his breathtakingly dishonest flip-flop over illegal immigration, was widely linked, and a source of mine inside the campaign told me they were very aware of it.

Of course, it also wouldn’t surprise me if there were some hard feelings over at the Republican National Committee because of some of the things I’ve written; so it’s possible someone over there put the kibosh on me.

There was the time I did a short interview with RNC Chairman Mike Duncan, thought his answers to 4 out of the 5 questions I asked him weren’t very good, and only ran the answer to one question. I’ve also criticized them for supporting RINOs in the primaries, for refusing to try to even the playing field for conservatives in the presidential primaries, and for generally moving backwards since Ken Mehlman left.

Well, okay, those are reasons.  John clearly is not broken up over it and, as he says, the show must go on.  Being true to his principles is certainly preferable to being coopted.

Posted in Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »

Palin as in mail-in

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 29, 2008

Your vote, that is.  Plus some gelt.  It’s Sarah Palin, America’s first Vice President who asks for directions when she gets lost driving!

John McCain has made his vice presidential pick: the Republican contender will tap first-term Gov. Sarah Palin of Alaska.

Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska, is the first female governor of the state. She has been a longtime supporter of Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., who will accept the Republican nomination for president in Minneapolis/St. Paul.

The 44-year-old Palin brings working class roots and appeal to female voters, becoming only the second female vice presidential candidate on a major party ticket and a first for the GOP.

Such the move.  Any time I heard someone mention Romney, I knew that person had no idea what he was talking about.  Run two wealthy white men against the Rainbow Candidate?  Sure death.  In fact, when John Hawkins ran his poll of righty bloggers’ predictions on McCain’s choice, these were the numbers (zero-vote-getters excluded) —

Out of the following VP candidates rumored to be on McCain’s short list, which one DO YOU THINK HE WILL TAKE?

Kay Bailey Hutchinson (Senator, Texas): 1 (1.5%)
Eric Cantor (Congressman, Virginia): 1 (1.5%)
Rob Portman (Former Congressman, Ohio): 1 (1.5%)
Charlie Crist (Governor, Florida): 2 (3%)
Joe Lieberman (Senator, Connecticut): 2 (3%)
Tom Ridge (Former Governor, Pennsylvania): 2 (3%)
Sarah Palin (Governor, Alaska): 4 (6%)
Tim Pawlenty (Governor, Minnesota): 14 (22%)
Mitt Romney (Former Governor, Massachusetts): 37 (58%)

— who do  you think was one of the four who predicted Palin?  Your host!  I’m good like that — the brilliant prognosticating that I only trot out when it turns out I’m right!

As John explains in another post:

[W]hy would McCain choose Palin? Well, she does have some real strengths.

* The conservative base would love her.
* She would strongly appeal to Hillary voters.
* She would help McCain go head-to-head with Obama on the “change” meme.
* She is probably the best of the women McCain could pick if the rumors about him and Kay Bailey Hutchinson not getting along are true.

What were John’s reservation?

I really don’t think someone with only 2 years of relevant experience (She was elected governor of Alaska in 2006) should be the Vice-President. I also think her selection would undercut McCain’s “not ready to lead” attacks on Obama . . .

He’s in error here, because there are no qualifications or experience required for a job whose main task is attending funerals.  And unlike Obama, she is number two on the ticket, not number one.  That’s a huge difference.  Meanwhile, all the bullet points are huge political positives.

Hurray for America!

Posted in Politics and Poker, Stragety | 14 Comments »

Is that where they keep them?

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 28, 2008

You can’t escape justice merely by donning a tin hat, it seems. The European Court of Human Rights, his last resort after a series of British courts were unhelpful, has refused to block the extradition to the U.S. of Gary McKinnon, a Briton who hacked into Pentagon and NASA computers.  This is despite the fact that he claims extradition “would violate his human rights.”

U.S. prosecutors want to put McKinnon on trial for allegedly hacking into 97 computers belonging to NASA and several branches of the U.S. military from a bedroom in a north London home. He claims he was searching for UFOs.

In retrospect it seems the better tactical move would have been to claim immunity under the Federations’ Uniform Code of Justice.  Or, from the looks of him, some provision of the Vulcan constitution.

It came from outer space, but very slowly

It came from outer space, but very slowly

Presumably the high-tech aliens he is seeking will swoop down at this point and take care of things for McKinnon, having given earth’s puny rulers every chance to act justly.  On the other hand, given their advanced state, they may just be too embarrassed, based on what he told Wired a couple of years ago:

A NASA photographic expert said that there was a Building 8 at Johnson Space Center where they regularly airbrushed out images of UFOs from the high-resolution satellite imaging. I logged on to NASA and was able to access this department. They had huge, high-resolution images stored in their picture files. They had filtered and unfiltered, or processed and unprocessed, files.

My dialup 56K connection was very slow trying to download one of these picture files.

It would be, wouldn’t it!

Posted in Jocularity, Lex scripta, Nuvo-Techno, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

Brown Palace Hotel and brownshirts in Denver

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 27, 2008

The CensorThese days you’d think that perhaps (maybe from reading my other blog) free expression, commercial or otherwise, were solely an Internet issue, and the MSM is mostly on the other side of it, hiding behind some pretextual body of law or another. (And perhaps you’d think free expression were solely a suntan lotion issue!) But it’s not:

DENVER–Police in Denver arrested an ABC News producer today as he and a camera crew were attempting to take pictures on a public sidewalk of Democratic Senators and VIP donors leaving a private meeting at the Brown Palace Hotel.

Police on the scene refused to tell ABC lawyers the charges against the producer, Asa Eslocker, who works with the ABC News investigative unit. . . .

A police official later told lawyers for ABC News that Eslocker is being charged with trespass, interference, and failure to follow a lawful order. He also said the arrest followed a signed complaint from the Brown Palace Hotel.

Read the whole article (via Glenn Reynolds), which includes language we don’t even bleep out at LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® or here, and video.

Pretty bad. It’s actually chilling when they don’t merely have lawyers send letters but use blue muscle to prevent the press from doing its job. I think they call that “prior restraint”? I don’t know what could possibly be in that “signed complaint” from the Brown Palace Hotel to justify this — should we ask them?

Maybe this is one Floyd Abrams could actually win?

UPDATE:  Glenn links back here (thanks) and to this story from the Washington Post, which includes this gem:

Jamie Glennon, a spokeswoman for Denver’s Joint Information Center, said Eslocker “was advised numerous times by the police before he was apprehended to stop blocking the sidewalk and entryway to the hotel.”

Yeah, “joint information” sounds about right!  Rocky Mountain high and all.  Either that or — despite how they look in the picture — those Denver sidewalks are mi-i-i-i-ighty narrow.

Cross-posted on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION®.

Posted in Medialites, Oppression, Politics and Poker | 12 Comments »

Stout, rested and ready!

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 26, 2008

The Stout Republican is back!

Posted in Blogophilia | 1 Comment »

EL PUEBLO! CORTESA! JAMÁS SERÁ TRISTEZA!

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 26, 2008

Speaking Truth to Moonbats

Speaking Truth to Moonbats

Bruce Weinstein sends along his latest column in Business Week, “The Ethics of Protesting.”

A Code of Ethics for Protesting

Yes, we have a responsibility to speak up when we are upset by what’s going on in the world, but there are better and worse ways to do it, from both ethical and practical perspectives. The goal of any protest is a moral one: to make things better (BusinessWeek.com, 1/18/07). However, this concern must be balanced against the ethical obligations to do no harm (BusinessWeek.com, 1/11/07), respect others (BusinessWeek.com, 1/31/07), and be fair (BusinessWeek.com, 2/15/07). With these concerns in mind, I propose the following code of ethics for those on either side of the forthcoming protests:

1. Obey the law, or be willing to accept the consequences. …

2. Be tolerant. …

3. Being respectful increases the chances that you’ll get you what you want. …

4. Accept that fairness is a bedrock of democracy. …

5. Recognize that our eyes are on the same prize. …

6. Spend your money. …

I love Bruce. His faith in humanity is almost palpable! Is he wrong to think he is talking to people who have some quantum of moral judgment, perspective, or common sense, as opposed to people like this?:

Moral Equivalence from Man Whose Hand not Sawed Off

Moral Equivalence from Man Whose Hand not Sawed Off

Well, it’s not really all that bad. In fact, there’s plenty of evidence that, the contemptible creeps at this link notwithstanding, a sunny afternoon spent at impotent, self-gratifying political “protests” is considered a healthy, affordable and fun family outing among certain cadres of suburban Stalinists as well as those geriatric hippies for whom it is always 1968 both in their hearts and their hampers.

Those toothless and tender types, I imagine, are Bruce’s intended audience… reading Business Week both to identify the fat cat villains and also have nice block letters to cut out. Man the barricades for good manners and just plain decency!

Hat tip to Pam for the links to the street scrapings.

Posted in Americana, Narcissus Rex, Oppression | Leave a Comment »

I didn’t write this myself

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 25, 2008

David Greenberg writes in Slate:

Biden’s exit from the 1988 race is worth recalling in detail, because his transgressions far exceeded Obama’s own relatively innocent lifting of rhetorical set pieces from his friend Deval Patrick, which occasioned a brief flap last February. Biden’s misdeeds encompassed numerous self-aggrandizing thefts, misstatements, and exaggerations that seemed to point to a serious character defect.

It turns out, in fact, that Biden’s just meshuga. But yeah, let’s not forget! Let’s talk all about it. After all, he’s a U.S. Senator, right? We assume he’s a crook. But no, Biden really did take the art form of political prevarication to a new height:

Biden admitted . . . that while in law school he had received an F for a course because he had plagiarized five pages from a published article in a term paper that he submitted. . . .

For all these disclosures, Biden remained unbowed. “I’m in the race to stay, I’m in the race to win, and here I come,” he declared. That meant, of course, that his days were numbered. . . .

“I think I probably have a much higher IQ than you do, I suspect,” Biden sniped at the voter. “I went to law school on a full academic scholarship.” That claim was false, as was another claim, made in the same rant, that he graduated in the top half of his law-school class. Biden wrongly stated, too, that he had earned three undergraduate degrees, when in fact he had earned one—a double major in history and political science. Another round of press inquiries followed, and Biden finally withdrew from the race on Sept. 23.

Political comedy gold! Yes, Joe Biden was Bill Clinton before we’d heard of Bill Clinton, and for far less, too. At least he’s not skinny. I guess it’s a function of when your political involvement gelled: For me, when I think of Joe Biden, I instantly think of the plagiarism. Then the goofiness. Then the hair.

UPDATE: Thoughts, and second thoughts, from Glenn Reynolds.

MORE:  More!

Posted in Narcissus Rex, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »