Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Science and God — perfect together

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 17, 2008


Meir Baal Ha-Ness
Originally uploaded by Ron Coleman.

The lie is given again to the supposed dichotomy between faith and reason!

Tonight we proved that a modest donation to the Rabbi Meir Baal HaNess charity will, as promised, help one find something that is lost — even on a computer.

Yes, of course I was using the Google algorithm. But nothing was coming up! Then the designation of the coin for the Rabbi Meir pushka, and voila! God sent my crack legal team to the right location to search for and find that pesky patent expert report. The evening ended, despite some moments of desperate excitement, well in hand.

Just remember to put the dime in the box when you get home! (I did.)

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

Wright, brothers!

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 17, 2008

[A]s Wright’s America-bashing gets more airtime — and as his Obama-boosting sermons put his church’s tax exemption at risk — Obama may have to go further down the road to explicitly disavowing his pastor. His connection to Wright isn’t the equivalent of John McCain’s going to Liberty University to make nice with Jerry Falwell. It’s the equivalent of John McCain taking his wife and children, most Sundays, to Jerry Falwell’s church. And the disconnect between Obama’s studied moderation and his congregation’s radicalism requires more of an explanation than he’s offered so far.

That’s as good a summary of the issue as you’re going to find, I think. I discussed the simmering issue of barely-sub-rosa antisemitism among black clergy (at that point, not Wright), in particular, here. Antisemitism of this sort is never found without broader hatred of America, and its values, and what do you know?

To me, the fulcrum of the matter as it applies to Senator Obama is this:

I don’t believe he believes what his minister says… exactly. He does, however, tolerate it, and consider it a legitimate level of discourse, albeit only in the “proper” context. And I believe this puts the Senator in excellent company among people of his class and race.

And I believe that it is the attitude of this excellent company, and not merely of Senator Obama, that is really what we should be looking at here. Because if he is indeed the man to prick the pimple of unreasonable race-based distinctions in this country, we need to know what is going on here, and why.

Posted in Americana, Faith and Works, Heart and spirit, Politics and Poker | 14 Comments »

School days

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 17, 2008

Nicole Black looks at an issue everyone has an opinion about but few people really understand — what the law does and does not allow school administrators to do to deal with student “dissent”:

It is the thorn in the side of every school administrator: organized student dissent, which “substantially and materially interfere[s]” with schoolwork and discipline.

She writes about a recent Second Circuit case, still pending, that tests the parameters of this issue.

I know, why bother learning about something when you can go straight to havin an opinion, but still — you’d like to have the option.

I actually talked my way into being admitted to the college of my choice largely on the “merits” of a jejune, but nervy, “underground newspaper” that a few fellows had been publishing and invited me to join in on — the Semi-Monthly off the Wall News.  It was the beginning of a career in a certain kind of subversion that is still with me.

But I never really doubted at the time that Hightstown High could have shut us down if they’d wanted to.  I’m still not so sure.

Posted in Lex scripta, Oppression | 4 Comments »

Taking the Iraq question seriously

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 17, 2008

Slate seems to actually be interested in discussing the question, rather than posturing about it:

To mark the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq, Slate has asked a number of writers who originally supported the war to answer the question, “Why did we get it wrong?” We have invited contributions from the best-known “liberal hawks,” many of whom participated in two previous Slate debates about the war, the first before it began in fall of 2002, the second in early 2004. We will be publishing their responses through the week. Read the rest of the contributions.

The reaction to this should be interesting.

Posted in Orient, Sisyphus, Stragety | 3 Comments »

The perils of making a decision

Posted by pennywit on March 16, 2008

First off, I’d like to thank Ron Coleman for inviting me to post occasionally on Likelihood of Success. It’s definitely an honor.

Second, we’ve got an exceptionally snarky Today’s Papers segment in Slate today. Reviewing a New York Times story on the Democratic Party superdelegates’ hand-wringing on the Obama vs. Clinton question, Slate encourages the superdelegates to just “[p]ick a candidate.” Slate adds:

As the Times says, “[I]t is a virtual certainty that neither candidate will win enough pledged delegates to clinch the nomination,” so the decision will come down to the votes of the superdelegates. But many of them are “hoping they will be relieved of making an excruciating decision that could lose them friends and supporters at home.” A true profile in courage.

Slate has a point. Shouldn’t these so-called “superdelegates,” who are supposed to be drawn from the Democratic Party’s leaders, put on their superdelegate tights and be leaders instead of waiting around for the decision to be made for them? And a broader question: Does this superdelegate superangst point to a leadership vacuum among America’s politicians?

Posted in Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

Holocaustism idiocy

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 14, 2008

“Ala. building can’t shake swastika shape”

From the ground, the Wesley Acres Methodist retirement home looks like any other building. But fly over in an airplane, and the outline is unmistakable: It’s one big swastika.

Prompted by complaints from a Jewish activist, the agency that owns the government-funded building is planning to alter its shape to disguise the Nazi symbol.

This is the most idiotic thing I have read in a while, and I do a lot of reading for someone who still moves his lips on the big words.

This is what a “Jewish activist” has to be “active” about? An efficiently designed building that invokes his or her superstitious emotions when viewed from the sky?!

Good things the Jews don’t have any real problems.

Posted in Americana, Homo sapiens, Sisyphus | 5 Comments »

Say what?

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 13, 2008

Instapundit:

If I were John McCain, I’d be asking why the party that put together these primary rules thinks it can run a health-care plan. Or the country . . . .

If I were Glenn Reynolds, I’d be asking why a libertarian like me thinks the President of the United States “runs the country”!

Posted in Americana | 4 Comments »

Deux Amis

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 13, 2008


Deux Amis

Originally uploaded by Ron Coleman.

It’s almost spring!

You can feel it in the air. All kinds of thawing of frozen things.

It can only get better, nu?

Posted in Heart and spirit | 4 Comments »

Funny, you don’t look vegetable

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 13, 2008

Heard this morning on the radio from Mike Greenberg:

Jewish wedding, New Square, NY

Vegans — they’re the hasidim of vegetarianism.

Posted in Americana, Faith and Works, Jocularity, Medialites | 4 Comments »

Does there have to be a why?

Posted by Ron Coleman on March 13, 2008

In the New York Times:

The $1.6 million Templeton Prize, the richest award made to an individual by a philanthropic organization, was given Wednesday to Michael Heller, 72, a Roman Catholic priest, cosmologist and philosopher who has spent his life asking, and perhaps more impressively answering, questions like “Does the universe need to have a cause?”

The $1.6 million Templeton Prize, the richest award made to an individual by a philanthropic organization, was given Wednesday to Michael Heller, 72, a Roman Catholic priest, cosmologist and philosopher who has spent his life asking, and perhaps more impressively answering, questions like “Does the universe need to have a cause?”

The John Templeton Foundation, which awards grants to encourage scientific discovery on the “big questions” in science and philosophy, commended Professor Heller, who is from Poland, for his extensive writings that have “evoked new and important consideration of some of humankind’s most profound concepts.”

Much of Professor Heller’s career has been dedicated to reconciling the known scientific world with the unknowable dimensions of God.

In doing so, he has argued against a “God of the gaps” strategy for relating science and religion, a view that uses God to explain what science cannot.

Professor Heller said he believed, for example, that the religious objection to teaching evolution “is one of the greatest misunderstandings” because it “introduces a contradiction or opposition between God and chance.”Peaceable Kingdom - Edward Hicks

So much energy is spent by people on both sides of this purported divide, uselessly assailing the other side. The only basis for such an assault is when one claims it can meaningfully explain the other. More:

In a telephone interview, Professor Heller explained his affinity for the two fields: “I always wanted to do the most important things, and what can be more important than science and religion? Science gives us knowledge, and religion gives us meaning. Both are prerequisites of the decent existence.”

I am sure that will rile up some people in the neighborhood who believe their existence is quite decent without any consideration of God in their lives. But I came to the same conclusion, myself, as a young adult. Not that religion guarantees a decent life, but that there is certainly little hope for it without some form of relationship with God.

Posted in Faith and Works, Scientificus | 1 Comment »