Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Confusion, dispelled

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 24, 2009

This post was originally posted on my LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® blog (where it was off topic, but in those days it was the only blog I had) almost exactly four years ago.  A friend reminded me of it today, and I thought it was perhaps appropriate to republish it in the season of solemn introspection between Rosh Hashana and Yom Kippur:

Last spring, I got a comment on the blog from a gentleman named Bunker Mulligan. I don’t get a lot of comments, which isn’t surprising; our content is so mind-numbing that few of our innumerable readers are in any sort of shape to do something so pedestrian as “comment.”

But Bunker did comment, and thanked me for stopping by his site. I hardly remember what I did when I was there and what sort of tracks I left. It was really two bloggers passing in the night of cyberspace.

And during this real night I was doing some routine maintenance on the site, and I saw Bunker’s comment, and I clicked through to his blog… and was reminded that blogs are people.Bunker Mulligan

Bunker — his real name was Michael Reed; he liked golf, so his pen name was Bunker Mulligan — died. He passed away at the beginning of the summer, a total surprise to everyone; he was only ten years older than I am and looked a lot more fit than I do now.

Here was his last post:

I really don’t understand why folks who dislike the military are often the same people who push for diversity. I can tell you from personal experience that the military is the most diverse group of people you will ever meet. We’ve got ’em all. Including members of a royal family. From Nigeria. Capt. Wisdom Osagiede-Ogbewekon. He is in Iraq, working to help get their nascent government operating. As he has a perspective they can respect.

“I tell them, ‘Look at me. What does that tell you? I’m an African who is an officer in the most powerful army in the world,'” says Osagiede-Ogbewekon, a member of the active Guard and reserve. “I’m a very good example of what America is.”

In fact, Bunker Mulligan was at least as good an example. This is a little about who Bunker was:

I have lived in many places. I am a Texan, and an American, and quite proud to be both. . . .

I support President Bush and see him as the embodiment of Teddy Roosevelt, who was also disparaged as a cowboy. I also support our troops, two of whom are my sons. One of them will go overseas soon, and the other one recently returned from Afghanistan. I have less concern for their safety than I do for my other son who is a police officer. He, unlike his brothers, can’t shoot first and ask questions later.

My daughter, the youngest, is in LA making her way in the entertainment business doing casting and production.

I’ve coached baseball at every level from T-ball to NCAA junior varsity, and football up to high school. I watch sports, but am not very serious about it above high school level. I play golf, and enjoy the game more than others due to the individuality, honor, and sense of community in it. . . .

I am NOT a celebrity watcher. I get frustrated to turn on the news. With everything of import going on in this country and around the world, the lead stories are Kobe Bryant, Scott Peterson, and Michael Jackson. It is easy TV, and not hard to put a story together around them, so something more important gets overlooked because it takes real work to get the story.

So, welcome to my site. I hope you find something you like!

I have little in common with Bunker. I don’t care much for golf; I was never in the service — he was an Air Force veteran, evidently with combat experience, though I can’t really tell; he was Christian, and I’m a Jew. I fancy myself something of an intellectual, and although Bunker had two degrees, including a Master’s in international relations, he seemed more down to earth than that. But for the love of God I can tell you that I was hit so hard when I saw this personal, honest, specimen of American life blog that I just broke down.

I like to say that some people have the ability to project personality on an Internet web page. What could be a more powerful projectile than, “So, welcome to my site. I hope you find something you like!” I don’t think anyone within 50 miles of where I am, on the crest of the ancient Passaic River basin overlooking New York City, could write a more earnest sentence.

And it has been a hard day that way, seeing as how earlier this afternoon I left my office and helped bury the father of a longtime friend and neighbor — he also died suddenly, scant months after the death of his wife after a long illness.

The dirt from the cemetery is still on my heavy-soled lawyering shoes. My friend, Mike the professor, spoke beautifully, passionately, eloquently at the graveside — eloquently as in I didn’t know Mike had it in him — about how his father knew so little peace during his lifetime, pursued as he was by hard knocks economically; and how he pursued his obligation to honor his own mother, especially after his father’s early death, to a degree beyond fashionable in our times; and then how his dad had to watch his wife get sick and then predecease him… and how his solace and his joy had been his children and his grandchildren — Mike, the professor; his brother, Eric, a Harvard graduate and succesful consultant, whose children attend the local Jewish school with mine…

Mike’s dad and Bunker Mulligan weren’t linked by anything but me and by being “good examples of what America is.”

It’s been a hard, hard day in real life, outside the blog world, separate from the Redweld folders whence come and whither go all the papers I analyze, generate and quote from while I generate more; separate from the adversaries, the clients, the judges; blogs, the politics; the trademarks and the copyrights alighting on the heads of pins. A hard day for a white-collar guy feeling the earth for a change.Springtime in Clifton

It’s Rosh Hashana in a few days, and God has done me the favor of shaking me up but good on the last Wednesday of the year. All it cost was a little sweat as I shoveled the dirt, and the cost of a shoeshine.

Solomon said, “It is better to go to the house of mourning, than to go to the house of feasting: for that is the end of all men; and the living will lay it to his heart.” Ecclesiastes 7:2.

It was better.

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

Filler

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 23, 2009

Morris County Courthouse

I’m trying a commercial case to a jury, in Morris County, New Jersey — it’s a wild and woolly one, believe me — so I can’t really blog much.

But did you know I once had a week-long stint on Overlawyered.com?  It’s one of my proudest weeks of blogging.  (I had more time then.)

You may enjoy some of this stuff.  I know I did.

Posted in Blogophilia, Heart and spirit, Lex scripta | 1 Comment »

Oh, sure, when HE says it

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 21, 2009

President Obama on Letterman:

Addressing suggestions that recent criticism of his health care reform efforts has been grounded in racism, President Obama this afternoon quipped, “I think it’s important to realize that I was actually black before the election.” . . .

Mr. Obama said the notion that racism is playing a role in the criticism, which has been voiced by former President Jimmy Carter and others, is countered in part by the fact that he was elected in the first place – which, he said, “tells you a lot about where the country’s at.”

Thank you, Mr. President.

Thank.  You.

Posted in Medialites, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »

On Rosh Hashana, it is written

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 18, 2009

Click here for our Rosh Hashana prayers. And here for some fancy hornblowing.

May we be inscribed for a year of life … of sustenance… of peace.

I’ll be back next week.

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

Beyond politics

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 16, 2009

That’s what Jon Stewart is, at least — at least regarding ACORN.

My favorite line:  “Your pimp outfit appears to be a fur coat on top of your Andover uniform.”

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart Mon – Thurs 11p / 10c
The Audacity of Hos
www.thedailyshow.com
http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:248916
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political Humor Healthcare Protests

Even Stewart is mocking that idea that this mere right-wing agitprop. As Glenn Reynolds (who I now see has also embedded this video) says in another post:

And you have to love this: “Robert L. Borosage, co-director of the liberal Campaign for America’s Future, called the tactics used to go after Mr. Jones and Acorn ‘McCarthyite,’ and said the critics were harping on minor failings.”

Yeah, it’s exactly the same. Heck, compared to Joe McCarthy’s famous pimp disguise, this kid’s an amateur.  . . .

Posted in Gelt, Liberal punks, Medialites, Metropolis, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »

Would you believe?

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 16, 2009

WikiPock is a mobile phone application that allows you to search and read Wikipedia articles without an internet connection. All the articles are stored in your mobile phones memory so there is no need to download anything from the network. Its the worlds biggest encyclopedia with over 2.8 million articles in English—in your phone, on the go!

You can get it here.

But — wow.

OK, the catch is you need a 4 GB microSD card for all the data, and of course that means no room for anything else on that card, either.  But you can get an 8 GB card or even a 16 GB card and still store all your other stuff comfortably.  And there’s your Wikipedia, right there in Mr. BlackBerry.

They hate us for our BlackBerries anyway.  Isn’t it worth it to always be right?

Posted in Nuvo-Techno | 3 Comments »

My September 11th

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 11, 2009

This five-post article was originally posted on Dean’s World.

I work in New York City. That morning I was late on the way into the office. I had to stop off at what was then called the “AT & T Phone Store” to replace my cell phone. I chose the one just off Sixth Avenue in Midtown, near the subway stop before the one I usually got off at. This was around 53rd Street — a good two and a half miles north of the financial district, if you don’t know New York.

It was a very bright, pretty day — I remember noticing this as I got out of the subway. I went into the store and found a clerk, and he was showing me the different models. And then his own cell phone, clipped onto his belt at the hip, rang. He asked me to pardon him, and took the call. Then he hung up and came back to the counter.

“My wife. A plane crashed into the World Trade Center!”

“Oh, gosh,” I said. I thought of the time during World War II when a bomber returning from Europe slammed into the Empire State Building. “What a disaster.” I had taken my family to the observatory at the Twin Towers just a couple of weeks earlier, to look at the whole world from the top of a building. The salesman and I shared a “tsk” and chose a phone, and completed our transaction.

I decided to walk over the Fifth Avenue, where my office was at the time. Two “avenue” blocks, about ten minutes of a walk, into the Rolex Building on 53rd and Fifth.

I went into the entrance on 53rd, through the cool marble lobby, up to the 12th floor, where my office was at the time. The elevator opened into our library, and the receptionist looked up.

“Did you hear?” she asked?

“About the accident at the World Trade Center?” I asked.

“Both buildings — another plane!”

Both buildings?

Another plane?

This was not an accident.

I walked past her to my office overlooking 53rd Street and switched on the radio.

This was something altogether different.

Part two here.

Posted in Americana, Heart and spirit, Metropolis | 1 Comment »

What the Jewish-controlled media won’t tell you about September 11th

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 11, 2009

First published September 8, 2007.

Instapundit points to this extraordinary article in the Weekly Standard about the Nazi roots of Al Qaeda, by a German analyst:

What ideas propelled [9/11 plotter Mohammed] Atta and the others to act? . . . . One participant in the Koran circle meetings, Shahid Nickels, said Atta’s Weltanschauung was based on a “National Socialist way of thinking.” Atta was convinced that the Jews were striving for world domination and considered New York City the center of world Jewry, which was, in his opinion, Enemy No. 1. Fellow students who lived in Motassedeq’s dormitory testified that he shared these views and waxed enthusiastic about a forthcoming “big action.” One student quoted Motassedeq as saying, “The Jews will burn and in the end we will dance on their graves.”. . .

Amazingly, neither the American media nor the international press took much notice of this testimony, largely refusing to report on Atta’s and Motassedeq’s explicit Jew-hatred. [I]n this case, involving attackers of Arab background, journalists apparently found the issue irrelevant. . . .

[Similarly,] the 9/11 Commission Report is a case in point. Instead of discussing the fact that Jew-hatred had reached epidemic proportions in the Islamic world well before September 11, the report gives the impression that Islamism originally arose in response to recent American and Western policies. . . .

A struggle against Islamism waged in ignorance of Islamist ideology weakens the West. The attribution of guilt to Israel and the United States adds fuel to the flames of Islamist propaganda and drives the wedge deeper into the Western camp rather than where it belongs–in the Muslim world.

Such blindness is especially hazardous in the case of the Iranian nuclear program, whose danger arises from the unique ideological stew surrounding it: the mish-mash of Jew-hatred, Holocaust denial, and Shiite death-cult messianism that is the context for Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons and advanced missiles.

What’s the explanation for this? I would posit a few possible ones:

  • A completely misplaced desire to avoid offending Muslims, who of course should not be offended, if they are indeed moderate, by accurate descriptions of their extremist brethren
  • A similarly misplaced, though relatively benign, desire to avoid, ironically, “blaming” the Jews for “bringing” this attack “on” America — as if to report this twisted, and objectively preposterous rationale would be to vindicate it
  • A left-wing desire to urge as “root causes” of extremist violence Western policies that are conveniently the opposite of their preferred policy prescriptions, coupled with the fact that describing deep-seated Arab antisemitism as a motivation would undermine those very preferred policies (e.g., more pressure to produce Israeli “concessions” from their friendly neighbors who supposedly desire only to live in peace with the their Jew neighbors)

Mix and match, or suggest your own. But don’t expect to read about this in the New York Times.

UPDATE: Meanwhile, across the Pond…

Posted in Faith and Works, O Mores!, Oppression, Orient | 1 Comment »

Samuels’s Round Tuits: “It’s like a masters class in blawg review”

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 9, 2009

Wow.  Remember what I said?  (And I’m not the only one.)  No matter what you do, don’t be stupid and buy into what some consultant sells you as “social networking” to build your practice if you don’t have (1) something to say, and (2) a gift — or a honed set of skills — for saying it in compelling fashion.

Well, that doesn’t mean that if you don’t have these things, the next best thing is to just steal it from someone else!

You really have to read this to see what @ScottGreenfield is talking about.  But here’s a sample of what on earth is going on out there, where it’s evidently nuts:

Scott Greenfield was displeased to discover that his RSS feed was being “scraped” and reproduced by an outfit called USLaw. When confronted by Greenfield,USLaw behaved unprofessionally; their unsatisfactory response prompted Greenfield to reconfigure his feed to offer only partial posts. While this is entirely understandable and part of a Greenfield post beats a dozen posts from most bloggers, the change was not in Greenfield’s interests or his readers’; it was a necessary but regrettable response to unprofessional behavior. For what it’s worth, while it was well beyond fair use for them to reproduce the posts as they did, USLaw didn’t represent Greenfield’s writing as anything but his work. USLaw behaved unprofessionally, but they were not obligated to do otherwise. As far as I can tell, they are not practicing attorneys; although they operate in the broader legal internet space, they are not legal professionals bound by codes of ethical conduct and subject to discipline for unethical behavior.

Without excusing USLaw’s conduct, what’s been done by attorney Melina Bennighoff or on her behalf by a marketer is much more objectionable. As Bennett explains, Benninghoff scraped posts from Bennett’s blog and others’ without those authors’ consents and reposted these on Benninghoff’s blog. It is noteworthy that the reposted items are identified as “by benninghofflaw”. A cursory search online revealed that Benninghoff has also set up several Twitter accounts with false names and pictures to drive traffic to her singularly ridiculous blog and boost her position in search engines.

What this boils down to is a practicing attorney lifting copyrighted content from other sites and presenting it as her own work for commercial benefit. That she may have hired a marketing consultant who has done these things in her name and for her benefit may be meaningful to some, but it shouldn’t matter; attorneys are, and should be, ethically responsible for their own actions and those of their agents. . . .

Confronted by Bennett, Benninghoff’s marketer, Wayne Conley, responded unconvincinglyand set-up a fake Twitter account using Bannett’s wife’s name. At Legal Blog Watch, Carolyn Elefant wrote about the whole sorry affair, calling it “Law Firm Marketer Gone Wild”.

It’s the Wild West out there.

Man.

And… don’t even think about it.  I say that with all due modesty.

Posted in Blogophilia, Lex scripta, Nuvo-Techno, O Mores!, Social networking | Leave a Comment »

“Moore” is less

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 9, 2009

A softer view on Ted Kennedy, though not entirely different from mine on the facts — merely on the politics — from my former professor, Sean Wilentz:

[Kennedy] overcame personal flaws and searing travails to become a masterful legislator, congressional infighter, and builder of unlikely coalitions. Ironically, he achieved all of this only after he had surmounted the political entitlement that made his career possible in the first place. In an even deeper irony, of the three famous and powerful Kennedy brothers, it was youngest brother, Teddy the latecomer, who arguably had the greatest impact on American politics and government. These travails and these ironies gave Kennedy’s life dimensions of American triumph as well as of prideful, classical tragedy.

When Kennedy first ran for the Senate in 1962, at the age of thirty, for the seat that JFK vacated when he was elected president, the rap against him was that if his name were Edward Moore [instead of Edward Moore Kennedy] his candidacy would be a political joke. It was true, of course: Although he was hardly a reluctant candidate, he was very much the dutiful, slightly wayward, much younger brother in what some viewed warily as a family that was busily acquiring a new firm, otherwise known as the federal government of the United States. As the assistant district attorney for Suffolk County three years out of law school, Kennedy’s surname was really all he had going for him, and everybody knew as much–but that name, and the presumptions about the politics and connections that went with it, were magic in Massachusetts. . . .  Never again, through eight re-election campaigns, would Kennedy fail to win less than 55 percent of the vote. . . .

For many years, he did not understand how the incident at Chappaquiddick in July 1969 foreclosed the possibility that he would ever succeed JFK to the presidency or fulfill the promise of RFK’s presidential campaign in 1968. In part, this was because he would never be able to explain his actions and inactions of that night adequately (except, perhaps, to the forgiving voters of Massachusetts). But the events also marked the beginning of what would become a convergence of celebrity scandal mongering and cynical prurience that forever changed the rules of American political journalism–and from which Kennedy, with his personal demons, would not escape for decades.

Read the whole thing; Sean is a pretty fair broker, and was probably right when he wagged his finger at the the House of Representatives during the Clinton impeachment.  I still believe that, even from the perspective of a liberal, Kennedy does not merit the special treatment of internment in a privileged spot at Arlington.  And Wilentz asserts the same thing above that my cousin Brian G. does in the Facebook comments to my previous post –“it was youngest brother, Teddy the latecomer, who arguably had the greatest impact on American politics and government” — and goes further than Brian in at least suggesting at least half of the answer why that could be, he does not demonstrate it; it’s probably a comparison of apples and oranges, anyway, but if given the chance I would welcome the opportunity to debate the question with someone willing to take the “Teddy” side of it.

Hat tip to The Browser.

Posted in Americana, Heart and spirit | 3 Comments »