Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Heart and spirit’ Category

Social insanity

Posted by Ron Coleman on January 7, 2010

I have had some weird experiences out there in social space, which by all lights is surely getting creepier and creepier.

First a few months ago there was this lady on LinkedIn who was pushing so so hard to make some kind of presence for herself.  She kept pressing and pressing to build this kind of community around her, not without some success.  Seeing as how she didn’t seem to have an actual day job (I don’t think just anyone can list themselves as “visionary” or “happenings mover” or whatever) it seemed no worse than all the other snake oil, and at first I thought perhaps she had something to say in there.

But I knew something was weird, including the fact that she kept saying in her postings that certain people were hacking her LinkedIn account and things.  I mean, I guess anything’s possible.  But then she started intensely hitting me with requests to tweet or link to these articles she wrote, and I sent her a message saying that, hey, maybe she’s being a little overly aggressive here?

Man.  Big mistake!  Check out this dialogue — I had to recreate my lines because I didn’t keep them, but hers I did (for the authorities):

NuttyLady: Would you please RT [re-tweet] a couple of my stories you like most today? I’m still not getting into the Key Word Search stream at all!

Me: Sure, I did that in fact just yesterday, but you know, you are maybe pushing a little hard here?  Maybe you want to RT some of my links?

NuttyLady: I have to rely on my network to get any exposure to the general Twitter audience. Thanks so much for your help.

Me: No, I get that, no problem, I just saying you’re asking a lot and it seems kind of one-sided.

NuttyLady: I am not getting into the Key Word searches because of malicious code someone put on my account. I am not automated and do everything myself.

NuttyLady (a minute later):  I am a professional writer with more stories to my credit than most people at, say, Huffington Post. You don’t mind RT’ing their stories!

I don’t?  Actually if I have ever RT’ed something from Huffington Post that would be news to me.  It could have happened by accident, but… while I was preparing that response, this came in:

NuttyLady: You are showing bias towards “Little Media” versus “Big Media.”

And with that she not only unfollowed me — she BLOCKED me so I couldn’t respond to her — and deleted me as a connection on LinkedIn!!

No, no, believe me — I’m grateful.  But I just wasn’t ready for that kind of nuttiness out of nowhere.  What with her Ivy League Ph.D. and all.

I lived.  And, mind you, this is all in the context of a very, very contracted social networking profile and much less time spent on this stuff than at this point a year ago, or six months ago.  Yet even as I narrow the gauge of my efforts, more and more loons parade through view via the keyhole.

Like yesterday — this guy with no identifying information on his profile whatsoever friends my law firm’s Facebook page, which I administer.  And I am not just adding people to my firm’s visible, online social networks.  There has to be some rationale, right?  So I ask him, as nice as pie, like this (again, the name has been changed to protect the unhinged):

Goetz FitzpatrickGoetz Fitzpatrick January 5 at 12:00pm

Posted in Heart and spirit, Social networking | Leave a Comment »

Best of 2009: “At the junction”

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 31, 2009

This was first published on June 24, 2009.

My first reaction when I saw this post on a blog called Infrastructurist (looks very cool) (via Boing Boing) was just to link to it on my Facebook page. I also lament the loss of these great — well, in some cases very large and grandiose, if not necessarily actually great — civic works of sculpture. I come to work, in fact, through the new Penn Station every day, and work in One Penn Plaza (yeah, me and those buildings!), overlooking (actually, straddling) the non-entity of a transport hub that now bears the Pennsylvania Station name as well as the depressing Madison Square Garden.

Pennsylvania Station

Then I went ahead and wrote this comment, and decided to recycle and touch it up a little here, for the benefit of my larger other audience.

To a large extent the manner in which the loss of these temples of transit compels so many of us is a testament to what we really think about a world ruled solely by utilitarian concerns. That latter, callous attitude toward the spiritual importance of environment on human existence, in the cities as much as anywhere else, is displayed by Alon Levy in the comments at the original post.

God help us in the soulless, bottom-line libertarian future that so many think they want!

Ironically, the utilitarian worldview is incapable of accounting for the long-term utility and welfare (in the microeconomics sense of the word) that derive from civic pride — the decline of which, from the 1950’s on, along with the decline in the quality of inner city life, surely must be linked to the decline of the humane in urban architecture.

And yet: As the (not so godless?) Alon says in a subsequent comment, “Ron Coleman, you’re the first person I see use the word spirituality to mean ‘preserving train station facades.’” Indeed: Many of these buildings were and are obsolete, and the cost of their respective upkeep, utility expense, restoration or retrofit, relevance to modern transportation need or all of the above would constitute a preposterous budget item for almost any public entity saddled with such costs. Only religious dogma, and perhaps theocracy, could justify such devotion.

Rail transport, despite its highly romantic appeal, is great for everyday commuting but is seldom of the choice of travelers from afar, for whom flying — even in its own diminished state as a culture and a humane experience — is a clearly superior choice. Most other travel remains, in America, highway-based, because Americans want to go where they want, when they want and with whom they want, and they want to get back home that way, too.

In addition, the cheap labor and lax or nonexistent building, fire, safety and access standards of the nineteenth century, which made it possible to erect and use these behemoths, are truly relics of a different age. So who is going to foot the bills to maintain these buildings as obsolete white elephants? Or is someone here volunteering for a special tax assessment so Detroiters can stare at their irrelevant grand terminal?

There’s the facts, Jacks.

I sure wish we had the old Penn Station here, though.

Comments at the original post.

Posted in Americana, Best of the Blog, Heart and spirit, Metropolis, Style | Leave a Comment »

Best of 2009: “The Specter circus”

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 30, 2009

This was first posted on May 7, 2009.

Oh, man. Okay, let’s say one more blog post on this Arlen Specter for the week. Check this out — a rundown of primo Specter humiliations from the Washington Post:

• Specter pronounced that he would be keeping his seniority when he announced his party switch last week — maintaining that his ability to deliver for the state would not be diminished in any way shape or form by his move across the aisle. Except, that wasn’t exactly right. The Senate’s approval of Specter’s junior status on a series of committees led to a “he said, he said” between Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (Nev.) and the newest member of his caucus. Asked about the back and forth by CNN’s Wolf Blitzer on Wednesday, Reid stood his ground saying simply: “He is a person who’s been in the Senate since 1980. I think he should be able to handle himself.”

Now, that’s a caucus you want to join, eh! “I want to thank you all for your hospitality and for welcoming me to your — hey! Where’s my wallet?!” Next:

• In a sitdown with the New York Times’ Deborah Solomon, Specter said he was hoping that the Minnesota courts would do “justice” and declare former Republican Sen. Norm Coleman the winner in the contested 2008 election. Whoops! Specter tried to walk the comment back [and] told Reid that he briefly “forgot what team I was on.”

Whoops! Come again? Here’s the actual report in the Times:

He voted against the Democrats in his first two big votes since the switch, opposing the Democratic budget and helping defeat a measure to allow bankruptcy judges to modify mortgages for troubled homeowners.

And on Tuesday night, he retracted a statement, made in an interview, in which he said the Minnesota courts should rule in favor of the Republican, Norm Coleman, in the state’s disputed Senate race.

Republican press releases snipe at his every misstep.

And the comment about Minnesota, where Democrats need Al Franken to become their crucial 60th vote in the Senate, prompted the majority leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, to confront Mr. Specter on the Senate floor.

“Arlen,” Mr. Reid said in his trademark low-volume growl, “What’s going on here?”

Mr. Specter replied that he had forgotten “what team” he was on. Later, he told a reporter: “I conclusively misspoke.”

Because it’s the team you’re on that tells you which side of a court case is in the right. Did I ever mention to you he used to be a prosecutor? The last one of the trifecta, from the Post story, is this:

• Specter has done little to back off his initial assertion that his decision to switch parties was based almost entirely on political calculations and had little to do with ideology. While most party switchers are almost certainly guided by personal political concerns (what politician isn’t?), most don’t come right out and say it because it is a turnoff for voters who want to believe that their politicians believe in, well, something.

It’s just that open and obvious.

Has it become pathetic? It has. In so many ways.

And I feel sorry for him, frankly. I guess that’s why I’ll never be reliable politically. I always find it pitiable to watch a man fall from grace, regardless of whether he brought it on himself, as Senator Specter surely did. And no matter what else, and no matter how much he wishes he hadn’t done this — and I bet that now he actually does wish he hadn’t, because a man in the service of his ego alone cannot be enjoying this one bit — it can’t be undone. Quite unlike Arlen Specter himself.

Posted in Best of the Blog, Heart and spirit, Narcissus Rex, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »

Silent night

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 23, 2009

Moon over Passaic Memorial Park
Wholly night:

For the second time in less than a week, BlackBerry users were plagued by Internet and e-mail outages across Canada and the United States.

Officials with Research In Motion, the Waterloo, Ont., company that makes the popular devices, offered no estimate last night when service to users in North and South America would be fully restored.

“Some BlackBerry customers in the Americas are experiencing delays in message delivery,” said company spokeswoman Rachel Colley last night. “Technical teams are actively working to resolve the issue for those impacted. RIM apologizes for any inconvenience experienced by customers.”

They’ve got to move this to “it’s a feature, not a bug” territory.  Because, really — what a pleasure.  Nighttime without mobile email.  In other words, nighttime.

There were no disruptions to the BlackBerry’s phone function.

Hey — baby steps!

Posted in Heart and spirit, Nuvo-Techno | Leave a Comment »

This is Chanukah!

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 11, 2009

Tonight, that is — it’s the first night of Chanukah.  That means that I’m going to be hosting the annual Blawg Review next Monday, at LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® (here’s last year’s).

Just a heads-up.

Posted in Blogophilia, Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

Not safe for work. Of course!

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 7, 2009

"Brother from another mother"

Personal friend of mine!

BITTER LAWYER interviews Randazza.  Of course it’s obscene — and hey, I mean like the kind you should have to go to jail for, man! — from “go.”  So for the good of your soul, no, don’t go!

At least don’t tell anyone you did.  You won’t fool God of course but at least you won’t lead others astray by your example.

But anyway — this part is not only safe for work, it’s safe for home, and should be required reading in law school, too:

What’s been your best moment in the law?

I don’t think there’s one “best moment.” Honestly, I live for the moments when I get a call from small blogger who has a really terrifying issue, and you can tell that there’s a real sense of panic on their voice.  When I get those calls, and I’m able to help, those are the best moments.

What’s been the worst moment?

Realizing that a lot of judges really don’t care, and they let lawyers get away with dishonest work.

That’s why Marco will survive, while my own prospects are less clear.  He realized that in one “worst moment,” whereas every day I wake up and think this time — this time, for sure! — Lucy is going to really hold onto that football . . .

Takes a toll on you, ya know?

Posted in Heart and spirit, Lex scripta | Leave a Comment »

Imagine no gingerbread houses

Posted by Ron Coleman on December 3, 2009

Hansel and Gretel and Gingerbread HouseDid you know gingerbread houses are religious symbols?

In what religion, Hanselandgretelism?

Now that’s an intriguing thought.  The Gingerbread Temple.  Hansel and Gretel, the trembling sacrifices, denied  at the last moment to the wicked, bloodthirsty — and, of course, Aryan — deity that craves their tender flesh by virtue of their accursed human guile clothed in the flesh of childlike faux-naïvete?

Or are these abandoned urchins of the countryside rather a pair of child-priests in this cult, giving up the would-be cannibalistic witch as a gruesome offering to the Gingerbread Man himself, rightful master of his House, following a kabuki-like ritual pretense of shifting victimizations?

Well.

I have go to get out more.

Posted in Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

It’s a wonderful life

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 25, 2009

In light of all the Thanksgiving blogging and tweeting, I am reposting this piece, originally posted a year ago — or was it two? — on the eve of Rosh Hashana. It was not being the first time I’ve raised the same point on Thanksgiving. Both days are fundamentally about thankfulness — and the introspection that it demands — so I’m bumping it up here again today, with minor tweaks, and with apologies for the seemingly clichéd title, which I really meant in the sense that, yup, it’s the season for inspirational reruns again!

Recipient

Recipient

It has been an extraordinarily eventful year for me on many, many planes, overwhelmingly in ways for which I am very grateful to God. Gratitude is the alpha of service of God, and of self-fulfillment, too — two endeavors that, to the thoughtless, appear to be opposite, but which are in fact one. From my point of view, neither is achieved fully without the other.

I say “from my point of view” even though my cousin Debbie, the writer, taught me many years ago that when you write something you need not say such a thing, because of course it is your point of view. You wrote it. But I say it so as not to offend my many friends who read here and who disagree and are, by habit, less offended if a proposition is put forth in a manner that sounds less absolute. It is a form of apology, and of course we know just how apologetic your blogger is at any time!

More of my point of view is my reiteration that when speaking of “gratitude,” God is the Whom to which gratitude must be directed, which is not to say that gratitude toward other individuals for their specific kindnesses is not also appropriate. But “I’m grateful” without an object — this makes no sense.

In fact I have never understood people expressing free-floating generic “gratitude” directed at … nothing. I do not consider it to be any more logical to say, “It is directed at the Universe,” which is essentially the same exact thing. I believe that people who express “gratitude” without acknowledging the source of the benefit to which they claim to be grateful, are saying words, but not, really, expressing gratitude.  Gratitude must have an object because it is an acknowledgment of need, or lack, fulfilled by the other. Failing to recognize the other nullifies gratitude, and makes it merely a statement of fact, not an expression of thanks, that the empty stomach is now full; the infirm is now cured; the benighted, enlightened.

But I am not here to fight, not today. Forgive the digression — there, apologies again! Well, regret may be part of the introspection born of gratitude, too.

Round and round

Round and round

And I for one am grateful, grateful to God, for a year that has been very good to me, and to many of the people I care about the most. Much progress, some of it incremental, but progress all the same.

I am grateful to have reached a point where I can perceive and appreciate incremental progress, too.

I am grateful to be able to interact with so many fine, deep, multifaceted people whose intentions are good.

I am grateful for middle age. I was born to be middle aged and now I am home. I hope I get to stay here for a long time!

I am grateful for life, for perspective, for wisdom, judgment, the ability to give, the powers that I have, for the judges who are starting to listen and the clients who do their best to pay.

I am grateful for the things that ought not be written, but should be said.

Grateful… step one. It is the first step, and while we must go beyond it, gratitude is the step that is never completed.

Thank you.

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit | Leave a Comment »

West End Avenue

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 17, 2009

West End Avenue

I always wanted to live on the Upper West Side.

Posted in Heart and spirit, Metropolis | Leave a Comment »

Love hurts

Posted by Ron Coleman on November 6, 2009

They took away my gall bladder a couple of nights ago.  Ouch!

Observations along the way:

  • For some reason the most callous people in the hospital are found in the emergency room.  Is there some deep wisdom at work here?
  • Yes, nurses do make a huge difference!
  • So do the English language skills of the nurse assistants.
  • Some food is not technically poisonous, but should be against the law anyway.
  • Somehow, some way, someone in the best of hospitals will do something really, really stupid and at least somewhat harmful to you if you let down your guard.
  • It is no easy task not to let down your guard once opoids enter the picture.
  • It is no easy task to sleep when you’re miserable in the hospital but the Yankees are keeping everyone else up all night.
  • It doesn’t help if your “roomie” falls asleep with his (loud) TV on and you’re lying there awake being too “tolerant” to ask him to lower it a smidge.
  • The semi-private room being the best most of us can ever expect to experience in a hospital, imagine just how dismal it must be, and have been, to be in an open hospital “ward.”
  • If the choice in “your” hospital, Mrs. Imus, is between a “toxic” bathroom cleanser and one whose smell makes sick people feel even sicker every time they go in there, after two (thank God, short) hospital stays in the last few years I am voting for “toxic.”
  • If you’re good with one-liners, the hardware-strewn, peopled path from your hospital bed to the moment when they knock you out for surgery is pure bliss and almost makes the whole thing worth it.
  • Almost, that is.
  • Calls from friends are very much appreciated, but those returns decline rapidly after the first 90 seconds on the phone.  You need to let them know it’s cool to wind it down without being ungrateful-sounding; they need to be listening.
  • T-Mobile is great — good pricing, lovely customer service — unless actually using your cell phone to talk to people or get emails is a priority for you.
  • Why do half the buttons (on beds, TV controls, walls) with words on them describing what they’re for not do what they say?
  • If you don’t take a punch in the gut from God as a firm suggestion to make a spiritual accounting, what more of a “message” do you expect to get and still be able to respond to?

Posted in Heart and spirit, Narcissus Rex | 3 Comments »