Don’t get unduly impressed with the Republicans. As of right now their main achievement is not being Democrats.
Archive for the ‘Politics and Poker’ Category
Oh… THOSE Republicans.
Posted by Ron Coleman on November 9, 2009
Posted in Jocularity, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
It ain’t me, babe
Posted by Ron Coleman on November 8, 2009
Revolt in Westchester! Walter Olson explains in an email, “Defeated Democratic incumbent Spano acknowledges the housing lawsuit as one of the three local issues on which the GOP ran, along with taxes and security-detail spending, and also describes his thumping defeat as ‘just an aberration — it has nothing to do with me, as far as I’m concerned. Really? Nothing at all to do with him?”
Well, Walter, kind of. Only in the sense that it has nothing to do with him because he’s an elected official — and, hence, it’s really all about him. That’s a bad thing?
Posted in Narcissus Rex, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
The FTC, and me, and thee
Posted by Ron Coleman on October 8, 2009
Ever notice how some people never pay you any attention at all? It’s still the high school cafeteria, isn’t it?
I have a decent B-level-blogger existence on the Internet, but it does gall sometimes. You can’t have all the Instalanches you might like, but I have nothing to complain about; and in general I have gotten my props. But no question there are some cliques you just aren’t breaking into if you’re me. There are certain bloggers who absolutely refuse to acknowledge the existence of anything I write, or even my existence at all, even when it would appear that, on the merits — for all sorts of reasons that these calculations are based on — they ought to. I could name them, but dignity does have to step in at some point.
And even then you’ve got other people paying attention to all the wrong things about me altogether! Can’t win for losing, you know.
Well, Walter Olson (who certainly does pay me enough attention) has rounded up some notable posts, and his own thoughts, on the outrage of the new FTC power grab over blogger “disclosure,” a topic that I first got excited over two years ago by publishing this piece in LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® back before I had this blog and that one had to contain a broader range of topics. Both Patrick of PopeHat and Glenn Reynolds have seen fit to link back to it, longingly, and as Patrick says, “Ron Coleman called this.”
If only anyone had paid attention to it then! But, you know… no-o-o-o-o-o-o-o-o.
Posted in Medialites, Narcissus Rex, Oppression, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
Oh, sure, when HE says it
Posted by Ron Coleman on September 21, 2009
President Obama on Letterman:
Addressing suggestions that recent criticism of his health care reform efforts has been grounded in racism, President Obama this afternoon quipped, “I think it’s important to realize that I was actually black before the election.” . . .
Mr. Obama said the notion that racism is playing a role in the criticism, which has been voiced by former President Jimmy Carter and others, is countered in part by the fact that he was elected in the first place – which, he said, “tells you a lot about where the country’s at.”
Thank you, Mr. President.
Thank. You.
Posted in Medialites, Politics and Poker | 1 Comment »
Beyond politics
Posted by Ron Coleman on September 16, 2009
That’s what Jon Stewart is, at least — at least regarding ACORN.
My favorite line: “Your pimp outfit appears to be a fur coat on top of your Andover uniform.”
Even Stewart is mocking that idea that this mere right-wing agitprop. As Glenn Reynolds (who I now see has also embedded this video) says in another post:
And you have to love this: “Robert L. Borosage, co-director of the liberal Campaign for America’s Future, called the tactics used to go after Mr. Jones and Acorn ‘McCarthyite,’ and said the critics were harping on minor failings.”
Yeah, it’s exactly the same. Heck, compared to Joe McCarthy’s famous pimp disguise, this kid’s an amateur. . . .
Posted in Gelt, Liberal punks, Medialites, Metropolis, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »
Stop the shell game
Posted by Ron Coleman on September 8, 2009
Career politicians use ‘remote-control government’ to accomplish taxation without representation. What can you do about it?
Read his link and then give till it hurts — hurts the trough-feeders!!
Posted in Gelt, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
The wrong thing: Kennedy in Arlington
Posted by Ron Coleman on August 27, 2009
I felt a little bad writing a fairly vicious piece about Ted Kennedy that I posted pretty much at the cusp of his stay in this world. But then I considered that, seeing as how he was so sick, he probably would not read it. So I did not kill him.
What kills me right now, though, is that while there is nothing to be said for speaking ill of the dead, there is plenty to say about the very ill idea, which sounds like all but a done deal, to bury him in Arlington National Cemetery.
This is astonishing, and it is so wrong, that we do have to speak.
Ted Kennedy’s two years as a buck private in the Army were spent far, far from harm’s way — and there was plenty of harm to be had, in a place called Korea. He technically qualifies for Arlington (both as a veteran and a member of the Senate), which despite running out of space is still open for business. But he is not merely going into a private’s grave or even a Senator’s : He is being buried alongside his assassinated brothers, a former President, Senator and war hero and a former Attorney General, bona fide presidential candidate and Senator, murdered by politically motivated killers for what they stood for.
And what did Ted Kennedy stand for?
Right, he just died. I’m not writing that piece.
But his burial alongside John and Robert Kennedy vastly demeans their memories, and is an uncomfortable reminder of the heavy thread — well, call it a chain — of political fixing and nepotism that characterized the entire sad Kennedy saga.
Jack and Bobby were not perfect politicians, leaders or men by any stretch of the imagination, but in the scheme of things, they arguably rose to the level of opportunity their father bought for them.
I know this because I read about in books. I was child when each of them was killed. But to paraphrase Lloyd Benson, we all knew Ted Kennedy, and he’s no Jack Kennedy… or Bobby.
Notwithstanding his legendary personal charm and “effectiveness” in the Senate, and not even considering his worst crime, Ted Kennedy was merely the undistinguished scion of a very wealthy, powerful family. He not only achieved virtually nothing on his own merit prior to his preposterious placement into the Senate, but had already been shown to lack the basic sort of ethical standards that would have, in that time, disqualified anyone else for high public office. Nonetheless he spent a gin-soaked lifetime raising the taxes and controlling the lives of those less privileged than himself, assured of life and, as it turns out, death in that exalted office by virtue of representing a constituency besotted by a family name burnished by his more accomplished and “martyred” older brothers.
Edward Kennedy’s internment alongside those brothers is a tawdry reminder of the stain of corrupt nepotism and elitism that will demean what had, despite those dubious origins of the Kennedy legacy, become a hallowed place in American civic religion. It is the wrong thing, yes, but in fact it is probably, at the end of the day, entirely right.
UPDATE: There are comments here, too.
Posted in Americana, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | 2 Comments »
Now that is one bad crook
Posted by Ron Coleman on August 5, 2009
You’d have to be to beat these pro-acquittal factors: A black elected politician, a New Orleans jury, and mere charges of bribery brought by the Bush Justice Department? Don Surber reports:
A federal jury convicted former Congressman William Jefferson, D-New Orleans, of 11 counts of being one big crook.
I am glad to see justice is served.
He likely will appeal. So what? He’s a crook. Send him to prison — or considering the cash found in his fridge, send him to the cooler. The convictions care a potential of more than 20 years in prison — give him every single day possible.
He earned it.
Well, those guys in Congress have to earn something, some time.
Posted in Americana, O Mores!, Politics and Poker | Leave a Comment »
Small beer
Posted by Ron Coleman on July 31, 2009
I hear a lot of conservatives screaming about the whole sit-down-and-have-beer-thing with the President and the Cop. “How could you?! After what he said about you!”
Easy, how could you.
He’s the President of the United States. Why wouldn’t you want to have the chance to sit down with the President of the United States, regardless of the circumstances? What other chance is there of that happening to Sergeant James Crowley?
I think it’s especially easy to answer here, where at the end of the day you’ve really suffered no harm and arguably have “one over” on him. Crowley has nothing to lose, except the phony “respect” of the Loud Right.
Posted in Politics and Poker, Style | Leave a Comment »
The existential threat
Posted by Ron Coleman on July 20, 2009
Maybe this is for real now. Maybe the sky really is falling, and all my measured lectures for loyal and genteel opposition were wrong, wrong, wrong after all.
Because, you know, it’s really always about the money. And look what the New York Post, via Instapundit, is reporting:
Congress is now spending about $3 trillion more than it did in 1945, at the end of World War II, once numbers are adjusted for inflation.
The only thing that surprises me about this is that this is only happening for the first time just now.
Of course, 1945 was a mighty expensive year, and I would have bet 1944 was even more costly. I would have been wrong, though:
Year GDP-US Total Spending-total
1940 101.4 20.42
1941 126.7 24.35
1942 161.9 45.58
1943 198.6 92.71
1944 219.8 109.95
1945 223.1 118.18
(Courtesy of the U.S. Government Spending website.) Astonishing. We’re breaking through every conceivable measure of indebtedness, and doing so recklessly, ineffectually and irreversibly.
What does the man with this plan, President Obama have to say about all this? Addressing the risk his fellow chefs may be balking at applying, as icing on the cake of fiscal collapse, the nationalization of the medical care sector (not to mention the criminalization of private medicine), he wants us to think big picture:
President Obama yesterday sought to reassure the public that his overhaul plan was financially sound and asked lawmakers not to “lose heart.”
“This is what the debate in Congress is all about — whether we’ll keep talking and tinkering and letting this problem fester,” Obama said in his weekly radio and Internet address.
“Or whether we’ll seize this opportunity — one we might not have again for generations — and finally pass health-insurance reform this year, in 2009.”
You know, it’s one thing to soft-pedal atomic-bomb type radical changes such as are being proposed for the healthcare system as “reform.” How much more do we expect from a politician? But when you are already betting the company on a radical fiscal policy that crosses lines not last crossed since the time our country’s very existence was threatened, and you think “reform” is the “opportunity we might not have again for generations” — it begins to sound a tad like you’re, I don’t know, being very unrealistic about certain things.
Like whether “we” will have any generations to speak of, government-of-these-United-States-wise.
I am now bona-fide worried. Read the rest of this entry »
Posted in Gelt, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus | 1 Comment »












