Likelihood of Success

Ron Coleman’s pretty good blog

Archive for the ‘Sisyphus’ Category

Terror is as terror does

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 19, 2008

Don’t make me do this!: The North Koreans say they’re going to rev up their nuclear reactor because the United States hasn’t moved fast enough for its totalitarian taste on a disarmament-for-aid agreement:

It is the first time the communist nation has confirmed a reversal of steps taken since last year to disable its nuclear program because of Washington’s refusal to quickly remove it from a U.S. terrorism blacklist.

And no wonder, either, seeing as how the North Korean government is, here, demonstrating that it is indeed terroristic.  Is there a more precise example of terrorism than this?  “Give us what we want when we want it or we’ll do dangerous things.”

Maybe they will have their reactor cooking in time for that famous North Korean winter.  Can’t eat anything a reactor makes, though.

Posted in Past is prologue, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus, Stragety | 1 Comment »

The City

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 11, 2008

Manhattan has been compelled to expand skyward because of the absence of any other direction in which to grow. This, more than any other thing, is responsible for its physical majesty. It is to the nation what the white church spire is to the village–the visible symbol of aspiration and faith, the white plume saying that the way is up. The summer traveler swings in … and as [his car] glides above the pigeon lofts and back yards of Queens looks southwest to where the morning light first strikes the steel peaks of midtown, and he sees its upward thrust unmistakable: the great wall of sand towers rising, the smoke rising, the heat not yet rising, the hopes and ferments of so many awakening millions rising–this vigorous spear that presses heaven hard….

The subtlest change in New York is something people don’t speak much about but that is in everyone’s mind. The city, for the first time in its long history, is destructible. A single flight of planes no bigger that a wedge of geese can quickly end this island fantasy, burn the towers, crumble the bridges, turn the underground passages into lethal chambers, cremate the millions. The intimidation of mortality is part of New York now: in the sound of jets overhead, in the black headlines of the latest edition. All dwellers in cities must live with the stubborn fact of annihilation; in New York the fact is somewhat more concentrated because of the concentration of the city itself, and because, of all targets, New York has a certain clear priority. In the mind of whatever perverted dreamer who might loose the lightning, New York must hold a steady, irresistible charm.

It used to be that the Statue of Liberty was the signpost that proclaimed New York and translated it for all the world. Today Liberty shares the role with Death. Along the East River, from the razed laughterhouses of Turtle Bay, as though in a race with the spectral flight of planes, men are carving out the permanent headquarters of the United Nations–the greatest housing project of them all. In its stride, New York takes on one more interior city, to shelter, this time, all governments, and to clear the slum called war. New York is not a capital city–it is not a national capital or a stage capital. But it is by way of becoming the capital of the world. The buildings, as conceived by architects, will be cigar boxes set on end. Traffic will flow in a new tunnel under First Avenue. Forty-seventh Street will be widened (and if my guess is any good, trucks will appear late at night to plant tall trees surreptitiously, their roots to mingle with the intestines of the town). Once again the city will absorb, almost without showing any sign of it, a congress of visitors. . . .

The city at last perfectly illustrates both the universal dilemma and the general solution, this riddle in steel and stone is at once the perfect target and the perfect demonstration of nonviolence, of racial brotherhood, this lofty target scraping the skies and meeting the destroying planes halfway, home of all people and all nations, capital of everything, housing the deliberations by which the planes are to be stayed and their errand forestalled.

A block or two west of the new City of Man in Turtle Bay there is an old willow tree that presides over an interior garden. It is a battered tree, long-suffering and much-climbed, held together by strands of wire but beloved of those who know it. In a way it symbolizes the city: life under difficulties, growth against odds, sap-rise in the midst of concrete, and the steady reaching for the sun. Whenever I look at it nowadays, and feel the cold shadow of the planes, I thing: “This must be saved, this particular thing, this very tree.” If it were to go, all would go–the city, this mischievous and marvelous monument which not to look upon would be like death.

E. B. White, Here is New York (1949) .

Posted in Americana, Heart and spirit, Homo sapiens, Metropolis, Past is prologue, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

Mobius and I debate what’s good for the Jews in American politics… and then some

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 9, 2008

My friend Mobius drew me into a discussion on Facebook of what an awful thing for Israel a McCain victory would be, and I posted a link to this post, where I addressed certain aspects of that issue a little while ago.  He weighed in big time in the comments, and while this is mostly inside baseball if you’re not Jewish, I am putting so much work into responding that I thought it would be worthwhile to elevate this into a post.

As to the first, it wasn’t that long ago that, when the Iraq War was widely “recognized” by smart opinion as a dumb, losing proposition, it was Israel’s fault that it happened in the first place — the “neocons” were handmaidens for the Zionists. Now winning it was dumb, because it’s bad for Israel! Not quite blame the Jews, but an interesting variation.

This is not an argument. This is playing games. I can point to plenty of sources, such as the CATO Institute, that in the run up to the war identified the invasion of Iraq as bad policy, stam, not bad policy because it was “a war for Israel.”

So what? Libertarians don’t prove (or do) anything. Ever.  This trope can, however, be found in virtually every camp that is hostile to “neocons.” As Dore Gold writes:

On the liberal side, Chris Matthews, who hosts MSNBC’s Hardball, echoed Buchanan when he spoke about “conservative people out there, some of them Jewish…who believe that if we don’t fight Iraq, Israel will be in danger.” Likewise, former Democratic presidential candidate Gary Hart warned of “ideologues” who were not able to distinguish between their loyalty “to their original homelands” and loyalty “to America and its national interests. . . Another variation on the Israel theme is the assertion made by Nicholas Kristof, the New York Times columnist, that General Zinni heard from administration officials that the Iraq War would advance the Israeli-Palestinian peace process because “the road to Jerusalem leads through Baghdad.” According to this thesis, the Iraq War would chiefly help Israel’s drive to obtain peace on reasonable terms – still a benefit to Israel. “

How about this:

The notion that we could just waltz in and inject democracy into an extremely complicated, devout and ancient culture smacked–still smacks–of neocolonialist legerdemain. The fact that a great many Jewish neoconservatives–people like Joe Lieberman and the crowd over at Commentary–plumped for this war, and now for an even more foolish assault on Iran, raised the question of divided loyalties: using U.S. military power, U.S. lives and money, to make the world safe for Israel.

Wow, who said that? Some black-hearted neoconservative? Yeah, sure — that’s one way you could describe Joe Klein, I guess.

Now, it’s possible that Barack Obama does not share this view — but how many members of his administration, based on the hard-left crowd around him now as well as the militant black cadre that is part of his base, would disagree with these assertions?

(Mind you, the first person to fire that salvo was Pat Buchanan, who is not, by any stretch of the imagination, a Lefty, let alone a Democrat.) Furthermore, you will find few on the Left or on the Paleoconservative Right who are worried about Israel’s security prospects.

I agree, and Barack Obama is on the Left. Read the rest of this entry »

Posted in Faith and Works, Heart and spirit, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus | 5 Comments »

Bad for the Jews

Posted by Ron Coleman on September 1, 2008

Instapundit:

JOHN MCCAIN: Bad for Israel?

Not quite.  Not unless you believe that the opposite — “good for Israel” means (1) being against the Iraq war and wishing Saddam Hussein were still around, because his loss as a counterweight has empowered Iran more than his removal has made the world, and the region a better place; and (2) the few policy decisions of the Bush Administration, which would presumable have been made and whose like would yet be made by a McCain Administration would not have happened under an Obama Administration.

Both of these propositions are highly debatable.  As to the first, it wasn’t that long ago that, when the Iraq War was widely “recognized” by smart opinion as a dumb, losing proposition, it was Israel’s fault that it happened in the first place — the “neocons” were handmaidens for the Zionists.  Now winning it was dumb, because it’s bad for Israel!  Not quite blame the Jews, but an interesting variation.

Regarding the second, Jeffrey Goldberg would have us believe that something like the following would never, ever happen if the Party of Carter were back in the saddle:

Recall that it was Bush who insisted, over then-Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s strong objections, that Hamas participate in elections in Gaza and the West Bank.  This was part of Bush’s brilliant neocon-inspired plan to democratize the region.  To state the obvious, that turned out badly for Israel too, and Hamas is now in control of Gaza and becoming a graver threat to Israel every day.

We’re supposed to believe that this dovish, idealistic policy would never come out of Barack Obama’s White House?

Israel today is in more peril than it was eight years ago.  In fact, it is in more peril than it has been since at least the Yom Kippur war of 1973, and perhaps even since its War of Independence.  So color me skeptical that Bush’s policies have been “good for Israel,” as the refrain in my community goes.  It is unfair, of course, to assume that Israel’s situation today is the result of Bush’s policies merely because they have coincided with his terms in office.  So let’s not assume; let’s look.

Like a good Zionist, Goldberg looks everywhere for Israel’s disastrous state but the most obvious place:  Israel.  The vast majority of its awful policy decisions, whether in terms of defense, international relations, tactics, economics and domestic policy, are not in any way decided or even on the radar on Pennsylvania Avenue.  They are the result of a string of breathtakingly incompetent governments purporting to run a depressingly corrupt kleptocracy to please an obsolescing and self-loathing elite that lacks the will to even purport to lead a confused and mainly unmotivated populace that obsesses on a slim minority of practitioners of its own religion in its midst as the bogeyman that explains its existential hopelessness.  A preposterously irrational and self-destructive foreign policy is almost besides the point and is hardly a surprise — but a secular Zionist can hardly be expected to wrestle with this honestly when there are Republicans to blame and election in the air.

Neither Barack Obama nor John McCain will do anything about that, nor can they.  But to suggest that there’s anything about Obama’s election that would be good for Israel is to believe that Jimmy Carter and Jim Baker really have Israel’s “best interests” in mind as they sell it down the river with “tough love.”  Don’t buy it.

Posted in Medialites, Past is prologue, Sisyphus, Stragety | 8 Comments »

Is that where they keep them?

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 28, 2008

You can’t escape justice merely by donning a tin hat, it seems. The European Court of Human Rights, his last resort after a series of British courts were unhelpful, has refused to block the extradition to the U.S. of Gary McKinnon, a Briton who hacked into Pentagon and NASA computers.  This is despite the fact that he claims extradition “would violate his human rights.”

U.S. prosecutors want to put McKinnon on trial for allegedly hacking into 97 computers belonging to NASA and several branches of the U.S. military from a bedroom in a north London home. He claims he was searching for UFOs.

In retrospect it seems the better tactical move would have been to claim immunity under the Federations’ Uniform Code of Justice.  Or, from the looks of him, some provision of the Vulcan constitution.

It came from outer space, but very slowly

It came from outer space, but very slowly

Presumably the high-tech aliens he is seeking will swoop down at this point and take care of things for McKinnon, having given earth’s puny rulers every chance to act justly.  On the other hand, given their advanced state, they may just be too embarrassed, based on what he told Wired a couple of years ago:

A NASA photographic expert said that there was a Building 8 at Johnson Space Center where they regularly airbrushed out images of UFOs from the high-resolution satellite imaging. I logged on to NASA and was able to access this department. They had huge, high-resolution images stored in their picture files. They had filtered and unfiltered, or processed and unprocessed, files.

My dialup 56K connection was very slow trying to download one of these picture files.

It would be, wouldn’t it!

Posted in Jocularity, Lex scripta, Nuvo-Techno, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

Dialogue

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 21, 2008

Teenage son (reaching for French fry):  I think this turns out to be one of the best inventions ever, huh.

Plate O.

Plate O.

Me:  What?

Teenage son:  French fries.

Me:  I guess.  Especially when you adjust for all other possible French inventions.

Teenage son:  I guess, yeah.

Me:  Thing is, it’s a little like Chinese food, you know?  When you order them, and when you first sit down with them, you can’t believe how great it’s going to be.  Then halfway through you realize you’re eating the stuff, but you’re not enjoying them at all.

Teenage son:  Yeah…

Me:  But you do keep eating them, because they are that good.  But by the time you’re down to the skinny overcooked little ones, you’re disgusted with yourself.  You don’t ever want to see another French fry.

Teenage son:  Guess you’re right.

Me:  Sometimes.  But I’m still eating them, aren’t I?

Posted in Americana, Heart and spirit, Sisyphus | 2 Comments »

Imagery Award for August

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 19, 2008

John Hawkins on Roseanne Barr’s blog follies:

[P]icture Kos sitting down to write for a couple of hours, but getting drunk first and then having a complete mental breakdown. Ok, now you know what Roseanne’s blog is like.

Of course we’re mostly grateful he didn’t ask us to picture… Roseanne Barr.

Posted in Americana, Blogophilia, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus | Leave a Comment »

With donations like that…

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 11, 2008

… you don’t need to sell things:

A bartender from Chicago, Stephanie works two jobs and wants to go back to college to study biology. After her roommate donated her eggs to a fertility clinic, Stephanie, who asked that her real name not be used to protect her privacy, said she decided to help an infertile couple and make $7,000 in the process.

Stephanie said if not for the faltering economy, she would not be donating her eggs. . . . “I make roughly $800 a week. The $7,000 will help, but its not going to pay for an education. I’m still going to have to take out loans,” Stephanie said.

Is selling something for $7,000 called “donating” now? It’s the word ABC uses in the headline, too.

Oh, and “Stephanie” the bartender’s economic analysis? Also donated, evidently. And worth every penny.

Posted in Gelt, Medialites, Sisyphus | 2 Comments »

Timothy Noah, master of self parody

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 6, 2008

I kept checking to make sure this wasn’t just something I missed on April 1st, but no:

When white people are invited to think about Obama’s physical appearance, the principal

Boy, could this guy pass!

Boy, could this guy pass!

attribute they’re likely to dwell on is his dark skin. Consequently, any reference to Obama’s other physical attributes can’t help coming off as a coy walk around the barn. A whole genre of humor turns on this reality. A Slate colleague informs me that an episode of the TV sitcom Happy Days (“Fonzie’s New Friend”) had its 1950s-era characters nervously discussing the fact that a black man in their midst was so … skinny. Was it true that skinny people liked fried chicken? That they were good at basketball? And so on.

No, really. Seriously.

So we, who thought we could take some solace regarding our melanin deficiencies in our endowments of underlying flesh, turn out to be no-good racists again on that score too.

I feel like a bit, fat idiot.

UPDATE:  Racist idiot, that is.  (Via Glenn.) (Bumped.)

Posted in Homo sapiens, Politics and Poker, Sisyphus, Style | 4 Comments »

How to write books in a prison camp

Posted by Ron Coleman on August 4, 2008

The Zek

The Zek

How Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, whose death I noted yesterday, did it — in the New York Times obituary:

At Ekibastuz, any writing would be seized as contraband. So he devised a method that enabled him to retain even long sections of prose. After seeing Lithuanian Catholic prisoners fashion rosaries out of beads made from chewed bread, he asked them to make a similar chain for him, but with more beads. In his hands, each bead came to represent a passage that he would repeat to himself until he could say it without hesitation. Only then would he move on to the next bead. He later wrote that by the end of his prison term, he had committed to memory 12,000 lines in this way.

That’s all there is to it, I guess.  It’s easy to be stunned by this feat, even by a mathematician, and forget about writing the 12,000 lines, and writing them the way he did.  When do heart, soul and mind so powerfully coalesce in one body?

None of this is to say that I agree with every little thing Solzhenitsyn thought or said.  His affection for the neo-Stalinist regime in Russia today is hard to fathom, nationalism notwithstanding.  Yet he did write in The First Circle, forgive my not having it exactly, “The wolf is not blameworthy, but the cannibal is” — he was a nationalist, it was a world of carnivores; and Stalin’s crime was not merely that he was a murderer but that he murdered his own people. The crack that this leaves open for murdering others is not untroubling, but in truth Solzhenitsyn never advocated or defended that.

Still and all Solzhenitsyn was one of the towering figures of the last century.  Liberals, for a brief moment, recognized his courage and his brilliance, even as pragmatic conservatives such as Henry Kissinger found him inconvenient, an embarrassing guest at the table of detente, and shooed him away from the Ford White House.  After a while it seemed as if Solzhenitsyn no longer had anything to say to us.  Yet much of what he did say in terms of criticism of the West — the materialism, the moral vacuity, the lack of true spirituality — should not be as readily laughed away by thoughtful people as is depicted having been the case among the literary elite in the obituary.  Nor was the accusation against him of antisemitism, in any meaningful sense, justified; familiarity with his works cannot support the claim.

You must read the whole obituary.  If you don’t really know who Solzhenitsyn was or how he did what few writers dream of — actually had an effect on history — this is your chance.  Do not pass it by.  Don’t you want to understand what our world is, and more of how it got this way?

Posted in Ars Longa, Faith and Works, Heart and spirit, Oppression, Past is prologue, Sisyphus | 3 Comments »